Re: [Veritas-bu] Restoring Shadow Copy Component/System State
2008-02-15 12:52:37
Um... that's not how bpplclients works, Randy. The user must
specify.
-- gabriel rosenkoetter Radian Group
Inc, Unix/Linux/VMware Sysadmin / Backup &
Recovery gabriel.rosenkoetter AT radian DOT biz, 215 231 1556
I
don’t think adding a new client is an issue. If I remember correctly, the
default selection is for NetBackup to ask the client what OS is loaded. So
if the lines of communication are open (and they should be) the OS should
self-populate. But you’re right, most of my discrepancies are from years
of upgrades and no one tells the tape dude.
From: Ed Wilts
[mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:02
AM To: ken_zufall AT goodyear DOT com Cc: Randy Samora;
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Restoring
Shadow Copy Component/System State
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:25 AM, <ken_zufall AT goodyear DOT com>
wrote:
Yes, NBU will
override the selection. We discovered that recently when we realized we
had a bunch of Win2k servers mistakenly configured as Win2k3; System_State was
still being backed up as opposed to Shadow Copy Components.
I think you may have that backwards but that's besides
the point.
I actually have a formal change request into Symantec on this
one - the backup admin should not be telling NetBackup what the OS type is when
there's a NetBackup client sitting out there that knows exactly what it
is.
This gets even uglier when you have the client in multiple policies
(common for clusters) and you have to keep them all updated on a regular
basis. And I'm just willing to bet at least a cup of coffee that the vast
majority of backup admins aren't told when an OS is
upgraded.
.../Ed
-- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
|
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
|
|