Re: [Veritas-bu] 71 errors

Shouldn't forcing the client to use VSS rather than VSP take care of anything that installing sans VSP would? (That is, `bpclient -client <client name> -add -WOFB_FIM 1`.) It's definitely preferable to use VSS for 2k3 and above (WindowsNET) clients.

Matt, the ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES target includes Shadow Copy Components (or, for 2k and below, just System State). It does seem like a bug to get a 71 on the stream started for it, though. What's in your include list?

--
gabriel rosenkoetter
Radian Group Inc, Unix/Linux/VMware Sysadmin / Backup & Recovery
gabriel.rosenkoetter AT radian DOT biz, 215 231 1556

From: Ed Wilts [mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:51 AM
To: Weathers, Matt
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 71 errors

Did you do a custom install and exclude VSP? If not, you should completely uninstall and then re-install without VSP.

We've seen a bunch of 71s on the Shadow Copy Components but those were mostly older clients and the errors actually went away once we upgraded the clients to 6.5.1.

.../Ed

On Jan 23, 2008 7:03 AM, Weathers, Matt <mweathe AT fbinsmi DOT com> wrote:

We recently upgraded to Netbackup 6.5.1. Since the upgrade, we have had some instances of errors backing up the Shadow Copy Components:\ drive. The problem is that Shadow Copy Components:\ is in the exclude list for these clients. Any ideas why it is trying to back this up? I have just noticed this since going to 6.5.1.

Thanks for any input.

Matt Weathers

Senior Systems Programmer

517-391-5021

Farm Bureau Insurance of Michigan

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu