Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Strategy

2008-01-07 19:34:55
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Strategy
From: "Curtis Preston" <cpreston AT glasshouse DOT com>
To: "Steven L. Sesar" <ssesar AT mitre DOT org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:19:59 -0500

Hmm… I’m going to have to look into this.

 

---

W. Curtis Preston

Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com

VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies


From: Steven L. Sesar [mailto:ssesar AT mitre DOT org]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 12:51 PM
To: Curtis Preston
Cc: Ed Wilts; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Strategy

 

Correct. I didn't mean to imply what I erroneously implied!

I can share another tidbit/caveat with de-dup that we recently learned: Exchange online defragmentation severely hurt de-duplication in our environment. For some reason, we do it nightly here; our Exchange group believes that it helps with performance (although I have other ideas). What happens each night, is that white-space is re-arranged on the disk, which in turn, changes the nature of the data that is backed up.




Curtis Preston wrote:

That is not a DD-specific thing, that’s a de-dupe thing.  You can’t dedupe encrypted data.  As to whether it can dedupe digital imagery, it will if you’re backing up multiple copies of the same image (e.g. repeated fulls of a directory with images in it), but if you’re constantly storing new data (e.g. seismic data, telemetry data) and only backing up the new data, it won’t dedupe.  (This is also true of any dedupe solution.)

 

---

W. Curtis Preston

Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com

VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies


From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Steven L. Sesar
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 7:30 AM
To: Ed Wilts
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Strategy

 

Oh, absolutely! If you store digital imagery, for instance, DD becomes very, very expensive! Encrypted data is another example.



Ed Wilts wrote:

On 1/4/08, Steven L. Sesar <ssesar AT mitre DOT org> wrote:

I second Data Domain as a disk target for backups!


We evaluated them here and they don't work with a darn in our environment.  For small parts of our environment (replicating remote sites back here), a PureDisk solution is working well but for our main data store, the DD stuff doesn't justify itself.

DataDomain is a good tool, but not necessarily the right tool for every job. 

   .../Ed


--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org

 
 
 



 
 
 
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
  




-- 
===================================
 
   Steven L. Sesar
   Lead Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst
   UNIX Application Services R101
   The MITRE Corporation
   202 Burlington Road - MS K101
   Bedford, MA 01730
   tel: (781) 271-7702
   fax: (781) 271-2600
   mobile: (617) 519-8933
   email: ssesar AT mitre DOT org
 
=================================== 



-- 
===================================
 
   Steven L. Sesar
   Lead Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst
   UNIX Application Services R101
   The MITRE Corporation
   202 Burlington Road - MS K101
   Bedford, MA 01730
   tel: (781) 271-7702
   fax: (781) 271-2600
   mobile: (617) 519-8933
   email: ssesar AT mitre DOT org
 
=================================== 
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu