That's a good question, I have not played with Vaulting in awhile.  For 
duplication via in-line tape copy it should be the same as a regular 
backup, I guess it depends on what kind of duplication you are doing? Disk 
-> Tape? Tape->Tape, Vaulting?

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000] wrote:

> I guess my question would be is a Duplication treated the same way as a 
> regular backup?  When a backup starts it looks to see if it has available 
> media in the pool it is writing to, if there is none it looks for a scratch 
> tape, if it finds one it assigns it to the appropriate pool.  Are 
> duplications treated the same way?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Randy K. Zimmer
> Sr. Unix System Administrator
> Office: 314-694-3109
> Cell:  314-960-0500
> rkzimm AT monsanto DOT com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:57 AM
> To: ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000]
> Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Duplications failing because of Specified Media not 
> in Library....
>
> Scratch aren't necessary scratch if they are frozen, run bpmedialist and
> check for frozen tapes first.
>
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000] wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> My duplication process has been failing lately on code 96 ( could not
>> allocate new media).  What's weird is I show that I have "scratch" tapes
>> in the robot so shouldn't it assign a tape to the appropriate volume
>> pool and start the duplication?  Any information would be greatly
>> appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Randy K. Zimmer
>> Sr. Unix System Administrator
>> Office: 314-694-3109
>> Cell:  314-960-0500
>> rkzimm AT monsanto DOT com
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This e-mail message may contain privileged and/or confidential information, 
>> and is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive such 
>> information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
>> sender immediately. Please delete it and all attachments from any servers, 
>> hard drives or any other media. Other use of this e-mail by you is strictly 
>> prohibited.
>>
>>
>> All e-mails and attachments sent and received are subject to monitoring, 
>> reading and archival by Monsanto, including its subsidiaries. The recipient 
>> of this e-mail is solely responsible for checking for the presence of 
>> "Viruses" or other "Malware". Monsanto, along with its subsidiaries, accepts 
>> no liability for any damage caused by any such code transmitted by or 
>> accompanying this e-mail or any attachment.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail message may contain privileged and/or confidential information, 
> and is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive such 
> information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
> sender immediately. Please delete it and all attachments from any servers, 
> hard drives or any other media. Other use of this e-mail by you is strictly 
> prohibited.
>
>
> All e-mails and attachments sent and received are subject to monitoring, 
> reading and archival by Monsanto, including its subsidiaries. The recipient 
> of this e-mail is solely responsible for checking for the presence of 
> "Viruses" or other "Malware". Monsanto, along with its subsidiaries, accepts 
> no liability for any damage caused by any such code transmitted by or 
> accompanying this e-mail or any attachment.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu