While other platforms may be “ports”
it doesn’t mean NBU doesn’t run well on them. I’ve
used NetBackup on HP-UX systems at 3 different jobs 2 of which were fortune 500
companies. I’ve also worked at places where we used Solaris.
It worked fine on both Solaris and HP-UX. In fact I had more issues
out of the box with Solaris because of the st.conf (lack of persistent binding
initially and patches that overwrote it – minor rant: What moron
decided overwriting a configuration file during a patch install was a good
idea?!)
I’m not sure I’d be ready to
try using Linux as the master just because the backup solution usually is one
you have to spend a lot of time on as an admin compared to other duties and
having a lot of horsepower from RISC based systems like PA-RISC (HP-UX) and
SPARC (Solaris) gives me comfort. Also typically the support on these
OSes is from the vendor that made both the OS and the hardware it is loaded
on. Linux can give you support from OS vendor and hardware vendor but
they’re not going to be the same so you can sometimes get caught between
them doing finger pointing.
From:
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Dominik Pietrzykowski
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007
10:21 PM
To: Edson Noboru Yamada
Cc:
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu]
NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s
Edson,
You get what you pay for
and I compared the SUN V40z (when they came out) to an equivalent IBM (x345
????, can’t remember) and it was 35% faster and only a few thousand more.
We ran apps, DBs and some
encryption software and it was a no brainer. This was all on windows but we
also ran tests on Solaris x86 and Redhat and found Redhat had poor support for
what we wanted to do. We couldn’t get plugins for the database we used
etc etc. We also found that filesystem (about 5%) and CPU (15% for multi thread
work) was better on the Solaris x86 system.
Just curious to know what
sort of benchmarking you did ??
You’ll also find
that there is a lot more H/W, OS, DB support for Solaris from Veritas than
there is on RH Linux but not if you mean Linux in general.
I guess some of the SPARC
gear has been expensive in the past but when you look at the T2000s and use
them for what they are designed for, they are very impressive and cost
effective as well. You also can’t compare some of the multi domain
boxes such as the E6900 up to the E25K, they are expensive but for large
enterprise business critical Apps I would only use them or a mainframe.
I guess you can buy Dell
hardware and I have in the past only to find that hardware failure rate was
higher and part supply was pathetic. We ended up swapping out the Dell server
for a SUN/HP(can’t remember) because we couldn’t get the same
motherboard again. They seem to change the parts all the time. This is my
experience in Aus and I’m not sure if it’s the same in the US or
other places ???
Answering one of
Aleksandr’s original questions, in particular the user base part:
> I think
there should be less bugs, better support and much wider user base for Solaris.
I’d love to see some stats from Symantec but
I’m guessing there are a lot of people out there using Solaris for their
master. In addition to that there would be HPUX, AIX and windows. I’m
guessing the rest would be minorities.
Finally, these are my
opinions coming from what I’ve seen in the past in the various places I
have worked at.
Regards,
Dominik
BTW I currently work in a
SUN Solaris / HP Windows environment. (with sprinkles of VMS, AIX, HPUX) all
being or going to be backed up via Netbackup. Also if anyone is curious we have
tested the VMS client and it works fine.
From: Edson Noboru
Yamada [mailto:enyamada AT gmail DOT com]
Sent: Friday, 5 October 2007 11:00
AM
Cc:
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup
on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solaris
I dont think so.
Sun machines are very, very expensive. With the same (or less) amount of money
you can
buy an excellent Intel based machine (with more memory, more CPUs etc)
and Linux with a so much better performance.
I see no difference in support from Veritas for Solaris or Linux. My opinion,
of course.
regards