Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] EMM interface initialization failed, status = 334

2007-09-19 08:32:38
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] EMM interface initialization failed, status = 334
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
To: Taher Taghizadeh <t_taghizadeh AT yahoo DOT com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:16:32 -0400 (EDT)
When you installed ICS, did you use the FQDN of the servername or the 
shortname?

If you used the fully.qualified.domain.name it will not work (ICS) -- use 
the 'fully' name only.

It seems the EMM server was not setup correctly.

Justin.

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Taher Taghizadeh wrote:

> HP DL380,Windows 2003 R2 and a Compaq AIT 50 Tape drive.
> Veritas Netbackup Enterprise 6.0 first install.
> After the installation completed, it has not possible to go through the
> wizard for configuration. Errors on the event log and veritas logs
> keep coming with IDs like 334 and 25.
>
> On the Services Window, netbackup enterprise media manager and resource
> broker did not start.
> On the daemon and admin log files of Netbackup there are these errors:
> <16> emmlib_initializeEx: (-) Failed to resolve EMM server reference.
> <16> bpstsinfo/update ERROR: unable to retrieve stu list from server
> <16> vmd: terminating - CORBA communication error (195).
>
> It seams to me that Veritas did not recognize its tape media. Anyhow it
> driver is listed on ODBC. so it is not the discussed case in this
> article:
> http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/281817.ht
>
> I install the " SymantecDeviceDriversforWindowsServers20070215_2878 50
> " then reinstall the netbackup but did not work. Also i change the name
> of master server into FQDN but it did not work too.
>
> Any idea?
>
> ---------------------------------
> Building a website is a piece of cake.
> Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>