Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Has anyone done benchmarking of any sort with..

2007-07-27 08:31:10
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Has anyone done benchmarking of any sort with..
From: "Kevin Whittaker" <Kevin.Whittaker AT syniverse DOT com>
To: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>, <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:05:32 -0400
Recently I did quite a bit of benchmarking on restores with ORACLE RMAN
multiplexing.

We currently do 4 channels to 1 tape.

Our test backup was taking 39 mins, with a full restore time of 2 hours.
And we tested other channels, and it seems that the restore time is # of
channels times the backup time.  So my restores are 4 times a long as
the backup.

Well, we also tested sending each channel to different tape drives.
Well the same backup was restored in 38 mins!

So, I am in the process of modifying my VTL to have enough tape drives
so that we can un multiplex all of our backups.

Also I will add vaulting a multiplex image takes longer than one that is
not multiplex.  And yes, my vault profile is set to keep multiplexing.

Kevin 

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 6:50 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Has anyone done benchmarking of any sort with..

The delay on Multiplexed restores?

Justin.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu