Re: [Veritas-bu] Possible to exclude Shadow Copy Components from ALL

Veritas-bu

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Possible to exclude Shadow Copy Components from ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES?

2007-07-11 04:22:26

Subject:	Re: [Veritas-bu] Possible to exclude Shadow Copy Components from ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES?
From:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
To:	"WEAVER, Simon (external)" <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:08:50 -0400 (EDT)

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote:

>
> Justin
>> From a Windows perspective, why do you want to exclude it? Are you backing
> up the Shawdow Copy from another policy then?
>

On various machines occasionally I find it failing error 41, upgraded to 
5.1MP6 fixed it but since we never use it anyway, it'd be easier just to 
exclude it.

Justin.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [Veritas-bu] Possible to exclude Shadow Copy Components from ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES?, WEAVER, Simon (external) Re: [Veritas-bu] Possible to exclude Shadow Copy Components from ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES?, Justin Piszcz <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade media server RHEL3/4->RHEL5 question., Justin Piszcz
Next by Date:	[Veritas-bu] Windows flash-backup experiences (again), ida3248b
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Veritas-bu] Possible to exclude Shadow Copy Components from ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES?, WEAVER, Simon (external)
Next by Thread:	[Veritas-bu] Windows flash-backup experiences (again), ida3248b
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]