On 1/29/2007 10:57 AM, Darren Dunham wrote:
> That said, my 6.0 machine appears to be using significantly more space
> for catalogs than my 5.1 machine did on roughly the same backups. I
> don't have exact figures because the data under backup has grown and I
> haven't tried to calculate anything, but I'm sure it's at least 30%
> bigger, maybe more.
Are you sure it's not the logs? There is another directory full of logs
and they can be *huge*.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org
|