Not doing TIR or BMR for the policy that executed the job.  Time really
isn't the question.  A delta of 90-95% seems abnormal to everyone in our
department.

Jason 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf 
> Of Lewick, Taylor
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 10:25 AM
> To: Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Archive bit and disk defrag tools
> 
> Turn of true image restore, you may be amazed how much 
> quicker the backup runs...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf 
> Of Brooks, Jason
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 8:07 AM
> To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Archive bit and disk defrag tools
> 
> Folks,
>       Have you ever experienced a defrag utility resetting 
> the archive bit?  It appears that we may.  We had a server 
> last night backup about 95% of it's file store on it's 
> internal disk (defragged by diskkeeper) while a SAN drive 
> backed up about 5% (not managed by diskkeeper).  This was all 
> on a Differentil-Incermental schedule.  The client is set to 
> use the archive bit for differentials, so we're wondering if 
> diskkeeper may have reset the archive bit, or actually set it 
> on numerous files, on defrag.  Also, the defrag would have 
> ran in-between backups.
> 
> Jason
> 
> ------------
> Jason Brooks
> Computer Systems Engineer
> IITS - Longwood University
> voice - (434) 395-2916
> fax - (434) 395-2035
> mailto:<brooksje at longwood.edu> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>