The latest nbpem binary we got (last night) seems to have corrrected our
"scheduling" problem. We'll be monitoring for the next couple of days.

/Steve
---
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Ed Wilts wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:00:00AM +1000, Wilkinson, Tim wrote:
> > It may be an obvious question but I ask it for a reason; we have a
> > policy that appears to be setup correctly and has run at some point
> > (using frequency) but neither the Full backups nor Incrementals backups
> > appear to want to run on their own anymore (presently, I'm having to
> > kick them off manually).
>
> Are you running 6.0?  If so, this is a known issue that we've been
> working on with NBU engineering for a while - contact support and see if
> the newest scheduler is appropriate for you.
>
> > I've tried deactivating then activating, but this hasn't resolved the
> > issue so I might create a new policy (with the same name) and delete the
> > old one. If I do this, will Incrementals carry on from the last or Full
> > backup on the previous policy or does it all start again as it is a new
> > policy (both polices will be exactly the same)?
>
> Since neither fulls nor incrementals are running right now, when you
> create the new policy, just manually run whichever full is due to be on
> the safe side.  I believe that it will do the right thing though
> (if it runs at all) and pick up where it left off.
>
>         .../Ed
>
> --
> Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
> mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>