Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Unix Master, Windows Media server possible?

2006-07-17 11:02:07
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Unix Master, Windows Media server possible?
From: dave-bu at graniteweb.com (David Rock)
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:02:07 -0500
* Ed Wilts <ewilts at ewilts.org> [2006-07-17 06:40]:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 12:53:51PM +0200, Drunen van, Marcel wrote:
> > The whole concept of NetBackup ensures multiplatform operations, which
> > is one of the main reasons why I suggest it to my major customers. In
> > general my advise is to have the master server on a Windows system, as
> > the GUI is much easier to use (and often faster). 
> 
> I disagree.  Put the master server on a Unix system, and then use the
> Windows GUI on a Windows media server or other server.  You'll get the
> best of both worlds.

Or use the CLI ;-)

> > The majority of problems I encounter with multi-OS systems is the
> > slightly different way UNIX and Windows work with name resolution when
> > multiple LAN segments are involved. Make sure your Windows system only
> > has one network name, don't try to bind a different name to each NIC, as
> > you can easily do on UNIX systems. 
> 
> Again, I disagree.  Whenever possible, you should use a dedicated backup
> interface and you can refer to it by its own name - i.e.
> server.prod.foo.com for the front side and server.back.foo.com for the
> backup network.  Just make sure that NetBackup is configured properly
> and you won't have any problems.  We've been doing this for years.
> 
> The only place we've been hurt by this is if you have a master/media
> server and try to use 2 names for the system at the same time (one for
> the master functionality and one for the media functionality).  This
> worked fine in the 3.x, 4.x, and 5.x days, but broke with 6.0.

As long as your server support team knows what they are doing,
dual-homing the systems will work.  In our environment, the backup team
has little control over the client systems and must rely on the server
admins to properly handle name resolution and routing.  Screw that up,
and it gets ugly to troubleshoot in a hurry.  

A lot of the ideas suggested here do assume a certain amount of
technical expertise.  Don't ever forget about the "Net" part of
NetBackup. :-)

-- 
David Rock
david at graniteweb.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>