Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Ethernet port aggregation for performance

2006-03-31 10:00:29
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Ethernet port aggregation for performance
From: joe AT joe DOT dk (Johnny Oestergaard)
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:00:29 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C654E4.A0F16890
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I have a Windows 2003 media server using 2 Gbit/s Broadcom NIC's teamed
together to a Extremenetworks BlackDiamond 6808.

I often see around 150-160 Mbyte/s on that media server. And it has been
working without any problem for years.

 

/johnny

 

 

 

  _____  

From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of
andrew.x.smith AT jpmchase DOT com
Sent: 31. marts 2006 16:10
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Ethernet port aggregation for performance

 


Does anybody use Ethernet port aggregation (ie Cisco Etherchannel) to
connect their LAN media servers to a backup network? If yes, what level of
performance are you seeing? and based on what hardware? Am keen to know if
anyone has found this to be performant above 1Gbit/sec speeds.... 

   thanks Andy.


------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C654E4.A0F16890
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40";>

<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:sans-serif;
        panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:Arial;
        color:navy;}
@page Section1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>

<div class=3DSection1>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>I have a Windows 2003 media server =
using 2
Gbit/s Broadcom NIC&#8217;s teamed together to a Extremenetworks =
BlackDiamond
6808.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>I often see around 150-160 Mbyte/s =
on that
media server. And it has been working without any problem for =
years.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>/johnny<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>=


<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<div>

<div class=3DMsoNormal align=3Dcenter style=3D'text-align:center'><font =
size=3D3
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>

<hr size=3D2 width=3D"100%" align=3Dcenter tabindex=3D-1>

</span></font></div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><b><font size=3D2 face=3DTahoma><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font =
size=3D2
face=3DTahoma><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] <b><span =
style=3D'font-weight:
bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>andrew.x.smith AT jpmchase DOT com<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> 31. marts 2006 =
16:10<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b>
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> [Veritas-bu] =
Ethernet
port aggregation for performance</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>

</div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'><br>
</span></font><font size=3D2 face=3Dsans-serif><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:sans-serif'>Does anybody use Ethernet port aggregation (ie =
Cisco
Etherchannel) to connect their LAN media servers to a backup network? If =
yes,
what level of performance are you seeing? and based on what hardware? Am =
keen
to know if anyone has found this to be performant above 1Gbit/sec =
speeds....</span></font>
<br>
<br>
<font size=3D2 face=3Dsans-serif><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:sans-serif'>&nbsp;
&nbsp;thanks Andy.</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>

------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C654E4.A0F16890--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>