[Veritas-bu] Disk backup - Storage Hardware configurations
2006-03-24 04:00:45
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] Disk backup - Storage Hardware configurations |
From: |
tim.berger AT gmail DOT com (Tim Berger) |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:00:45 -1000 |
------=_Part_6182_19095366.1143190845592
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
I have two Linux media servers setup with 3ware 9500S controllers using rai=
d
"50" with seagate disks. With our configuration this is two raid 5's of 6
disks each that are then striped together. I get up to about 70MB/sec
writes and 300MB/sec reads after the readahead is tweaked up.
They are used for DSSU's going to IBM LTO3's and I'm seeing up to 160MB/sec
writes to tape. I'm very happy so far.
I get better read performance with raid5 or raid50 than with raid 10. But =
I
use raid 10 for the catalog raid for best write performance. I see a bit
over 100MB/sec reads & writes with raid 10.
On 3/22/06, Ambrose, Monte <mambrose AT qualcomm DOT com> wrote:
>
> I wanted to get a feel for what type of disk storage is being used out
> there for disk based backups. I am specifically looking for SAN attached
> storage ATA, SATA and what type of RAID is used and how it is performing
> overall. The NBU 6.0 tuning guide shows RAID-5 but I am wondering if
> anyone is using RAID-10 or others.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Monte
>
>
>
--
-Tim
------=_Part_6182_19095366.1143190845592
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
I have two Linux media servers setup with 3ware 9500S controllers using rai=
d "50" with seagate disks. With our configuration thi=
s is two raid 5's of 6 disks each that are then striped together. I g=
et up to about 70MB/sec writes and 300MB/sec reads after the readahead is t=
weaked up. =20
<br><br>They are used for DSSU's going to IBM LTO3's and I'm seeing up to 1=
60MB/sec writes to tape. I'm very happy so far.<br><br>I get better r=
ead performance with raid5 or raid50 than with raid
10. But I use raid 10 for the catalog raid for best write performance=
. I see a bit over 100MB/sec reads & writes with raid 10.<br>
<br><div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 3/22/06, <b class=3D"gmail_senderna=
me">Ambrose, Monte</b> <<a href=3D"mailto:mambrose AT qualcomm DOT
com">mambros=
e AT qualcomm DOT com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=
=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; p=
adding-left: 1ex;">
<div style=3D"direction: ltr;">
<div>
<p style=3D""><font face=3D"Courier New" size=3D"2"><span style=3D"font-siz=
e: 10pt;">I wanted to get a feel for
what type of disk storage is being used out there for disk based backups.&n=
bsp;
I am specifically looking for SAN attached storage ATA, SATA and what type =
of
RAID is used and how it is performing overall. The NBU 6.0 tuni=
ng
guide shows RAID-5 but I am wondering if anyone is using RAID-10 or others.=
</span></font></p>
<p style=3D""><font face=3D"Courier New" size=3D"2"><span style=3D"font-siz=
e: 10pt;"> </span></font></p>
<p style=3D""><font face=3D"Courier New" size=3D"2"><span style=3D"font-siz=
e: 10pt;">Thanks, Monte</span></font></p>
<p><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-fam=
ily: Arial;"> </span></font></p>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>-Tim
------=_Part_6182_19095366.1143190845592--
|
|
|