That's interesting. I will have another play around tomorrow, but I 
tried it out on two completely separate installs, one was RHEL 4.2 
(well, CentOS really) and the other was Windows 2003.

Thinking about it, even though I connected to two different clients each 
time, they may well both have been at 5.1 MP3. I will try 6.0 --> 6.0 
tomorrow, but even so - I would have expected it to work anyway.

Thanks for the info!

James

Tim Hoke wrote:
> Hmmm... Seems to work for me when running on a RHEL 3 system against a 
> RHEL 3 system.  It also works for me on other various combinations.
>
> Can you give any more details?
>
> -Tim
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2005, at 11:07 AM, James Pattinson wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Shame to see that bpcoverage does NOT work on 6.0. It segfaults on 
>> Linux and DrWatsons on Windows. This is a very useful command but 
>> unfortunately it's not supported since it's not in the manual.
>>
>> Just thought I'd let you know. It might be worth mentioning this to 
>> your Veritas guys if you had found bpcoverage useful in the past for 
>> checking connectivity to clients.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> James
>>
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.