Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Cumalitive Incremental Backup Problems

2005-11-02 16:21:01
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cumalitive Incremental Backup Problems
From: tlewick AT hrblock DOT com (Lewick, Taylor)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:21:01 -0600
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5DFF3.52FBF6FC
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have been noticing some strange/bad behavior with our main file server
backups, a 2 node active/passive windows 2003 cluster.=20

=20

We are running weekly full backups on the weekends, and the past few
weeks full are all successful. =20

During the week we are running cumulative incrementals and I have
noticed that the incrementals are as big or nearly as big as the fulls.
We checked the archive bits and they are not set, and the timestamps of
the files are not being modified every night.

=20

Has anyone seen this type of behavior before with cumulative
incrementals? =20

=20

We are currently at 4.5 FP 8 slated to upgrade to 5.1 next month, client
on the cluster is FP6.

=20

Thanks,
Taylor

=20


------_=_NextPart_001_01C5DFF3.52FBF6FC
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>

<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">


<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)">
<title>Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.x or Netbackup 6.x</title>

<style>
<!--
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {margin-right:0in;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle18
        {font-family:Arial;
        color:navy;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dblue>

<div class=3DSection1>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>I have been noticing some =
strange/bad
behavior with our main file server backups, a 2 node active/passive =
windows
2003 cluster. </span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>We are running weekly full backups =
on the
weekends, and the past few weeks full are all successful.&nbsp; =
</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>During the week we are running =
cumulative incrementals
and I have noticed that the incrementals are as big or nearly as big as =
the fulls.&nbsp;
We checked the archive bits and they are not set, and the timestamps of =
the
files are not being modified every night.</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Has anyone seen this type of =
behavior
before with cumulative incrementals?&nbsp; </span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>We are currently at 4.5 FP 8 slated =
to
upgrade to 5.1 next month, client on the cluster is =
FP6.</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Thanks,<br>
Taylor</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>
=00
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5DFF3.52FBF6FC--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Veritas-bu] Cumalitive Incremental Backup Problems, Lewick, Taylor <=