[Veritas-bu] Netbackup doesn't seem to like IBM's GPFS << Revised
2005-10-20 13:24:00
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup doesn't seem to like IBM's GPFS << Revised |
From: |
pcd AT xinupro DOT com (Peter DrakeUnderkoffler) |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:24:00 -0400 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Don't know a thing about GPFS, is it a POSIX compliant f/s?
How does IBM want you to back it up?
Thanks
Peter DrakeUnderkoffler
Mark.Donaldson AT cexp DOT com wrote:
> Original note said Oracle's GPFS. It's not Oracle's GPFS, it's IBM's GPFS
> on which Oracle is certified. OCFS is not certified on AIX. It's IBM's
> answer to a clustered filesystem.
>
> Lots of warnings trying to back up a GPFS filesystem mounted on an AIX v5.3
> box:
>
> 10/19/2005 17:02:13 uscobrmfa-ug-50 uscobrmfa-ad-95 from client
> uscobrmfa-ad-95: WRN - Could not get ACL
> information for
> /oragpfs/INSTALL_FILES/10102_install/Disk1/stage/
> Components/oracle.p2k.precomp_common/10.1.0.2.0/1
> /DataFiles/mesg.11.1.jar. Errno = 22: A system
> call received a parameter that is not valid.
>
> A search for "GPFS" in the Veritas support pages doesn't yield anything.
> Google continues to be little help either.
>
> Anybody have any comments on this?
>
> -M
>
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> Mark Donaldson - Systems Administrator - 303-664-2040
> Corporate Express - Broomfield, Colorado
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> Blah, Blah, Blah. Yadda, Yadda, Yadda.
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFDV9Kwl+lekZRM55oRAqh/AKCm2wdGTM5mqlxpRmV4iCYapSLbEwCg4XQB
vxnrJCGV+y1w1jR7k/0Jcig=
=gNyM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|