We have 1.2TB disk staging units with max concurrent jobs set to 4 and
multiplexing is 1

-Shyam

On 8/23/05, Paul Keating <pkeating AT bank-banque-canada DOT ca> wrote:
> Performance limitation.
> 
> Doing your offload to tape is requiring the heads to seek which would
> kill backup performance.
> 
> I'm very interested to hear more about Kathryn's 24 concurrant jobs to a
> staging unit.
> Everyone else seems to say 1 or max 2 jobs per!!!
> 
> Paul
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > [mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of
> > william.d.brown AT gsk DOT com
> > Sent: August 23, 2005 2:00 AM
> > To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Re: Fast backup to tape but slow
> > backup to disk on NBU
> >
> >
> > Kathryn,
> >
> > You said:
> >
> > <<However, because I can't stage diskimages to tape while
> > active backups
> > are writing to the disks,>>
> >
> > Is that a product limitation, or due to some practical
> > reality?  Is it an
> > easy script...presumably you need a quiet point to run the script?
> >
> > William D L Brown
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>