Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Help with scheduling

2005-07-18 16:45:18
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Help with scheduling
From: wtsmith AT maine DOT edu (Wayne T Smith)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:45:18 -0400
What Ed said.

... and I'll add two and a half comments ...

(1) A retention of twice the frequency is way too short a retention for 
my taste.  A retention of one week is too short for anything!  Remember 
that it's one thing to discover the need for a restore in a certain time 
period, but quite another to discover the problem *and* get the restore 
completed.   For example, perhaps a minor server goes down and won't be 
repaired/replaced for a week.  You've got excellent ability to restore 
your last backup today, but will you in a week?  

(2) Make sure your scheme is grounded in what the data owners require 
for restorability.  This describes a "complicated" (IMHO) backup 
scenario without discussing the restore commitment/expectation.  Without 
knowing what's behind it, it looks like a design that uses NetBackup 
features rather than solves a particular problem.  For example, in your 
shop is there much of a difference between cumulative and differential 
incrementals?  To my mind, the only reason not to do a full is that you 
can't "afford" it, in some sense.  Likewise, never do a differential if 
you can afford a cumulative.  It shortens restore times and lessens risk.

(2 and 1/2) Advice to limit data to only one retention period on any one 
tape is normally good advice, IMHO.  You have 4 different retentions, 
suggesting this scheme may require more tape drives than a simpler one.  
Of course, backup to disk and multiplexing affect this area.

(2 and 3/4) Bonus advice.  A full backup every three months is way too 
long, IMHO.  It might be OK for some very static systems, but I've not 
seen them.  Make a substantial change and you'll be backing it up a lot. 
Better to make more frequent "Fulls". 

(2 and 5/6) Is there a need for separate offsite storage?  How does that 
affect the plan?

Hope this helps, or at least gets a discussion going!
wayne

Larsen, Errin M HMMA/Information Technology Department wrote, in part,  
on 7/18/2005 2:54 PM:

>Hi NBUers,
>
>I'm trying to create a set of schedules for a policy as follows:
>
>1) Full Backup, retention 1 year, every 3 months (1 time per quarter),
>on the 1st Sunday of that month
>
>2) Cum. Incr. every month, retention 2 months, on the 1st Sunday of that
>month (excluding the month of the full)
>
>3) Cum. Incr. every Sunday, retention 2 weeks (excluding the 1st Sunday
>of that month)
>
>4) Diff. Incr. every Mon - Sat, retention 1 week
>
>Please, comment/critique on the design.
>
>I'm writing to the list, however, to get advice/help on implementing
>this.  What kind (Calendar/Frequency) of schedule works best for this
>kind of thing?
>
>--Errin
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>  
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>