Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Best way to backup 3TB of data daily?

2005-05-20 13:04:40
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Best way to backup 3TB of data daily?
From: SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com (Scott Jacobson)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 11:04:40 -0600
This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to 
consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to 
properly handle MIME multipart messages.

--=__Part0427C5B8.2__=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

or think VLT's

>>> "Kennedy, Jeffrey" <jkennedy AT qualcomm DOT com> 5/20/2005 9:45 AM >>>
The particular problem (according to Veritas) is their being able to track =
2tb worth of data in a single location.  Think disk stu's.

Whether or not that is true is open to the floor.  Many times we get =
conflicting information from support, engineering, and white papers.  I'm =
merely passing along another bit we were told.

~JK

-----Original Message-----
From: DATASEC Software GmbH Javier Gonz=E1lez [mailto:jg AT datasec DOT ch]=20
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 7:44 AM
To: 'Michael L. Barrow'; Kennedy, Jeffrey
Cc: 'Sto RageC'; 'Piszcz, Justin'; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Best way to backup 3TB of data daily?

It's not possible a " limit is 2tb *on a single tape* " because no tape =
(at
the moment) is able to handle such capacity
Max SAIT is 1.2 TB x band
Otherwise, we have customers with 3.2 TB files and we backup them without
problems.

Sincerely

DATASEC
Javier Gonzalez

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Michael L.
Barrow
Sent: Freitag, 20. Mai 2005 16:00
To: Kennedy, Jeffrey
Cc: Sto RageC; Piszcz, Justin; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Best way to backup 3TB of data daily?

Kennedy, Jeffrey wrote:
> The limit of 1tb is actually not correct anymore.  It's not an NDMP=20
> stream limit either.  We were worried about this as well but our=20
> operations have confirmed the limit is 2tb *on a single tape*, not a=20
> stream.  Something to do with how much it can track in a single=20
> location, or something like that.
>=20

That doesn't seem to be accurate based on this alert:
<http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/273806.htm>

So, which is the truth?

--
Michael L. Barrow
<michael AT michaelbarrow DOT name>
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



--=__Part0427C5B8.2__=
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"=
>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">or think VLT's<BR><B=
R>&gt;&gt;&gt; "Kennedy, Jeffrey" &lt;jkennedy AT qualcomm DOT com&gt; 
5/20/2005 =
9:45 AM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>
<DIV style=3D"COLOR: #000000">The particular problem (according to =
Veritas) is their being able to track 2tb worth of data in a single =
location.&nbsp; Think disk stu's.<BR><BR>Whether or not that is true is =
open to the floor.&nbsp; Many times we get conflicting information from =
support, engineering, and white papers.&nbsp; I'm merely passing along =
another bit we were told.<BR><BR>~JK<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>F=
rom: DATASEC Software GmbH Javier Gonz=E1lez [<A href=3D"mailto:jg@datasec.=
ch]">mailto:jg AT datasec DOT ch]</A> <BR>Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 7:44 =
AM<BR>To: 'Michael L. Barrow'; Kennedy, Jeffrey<BR>Cc: 'Sto RageC'; =
'Piszcz, Justin'; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR>Subject: RE: =
[Veritas-bu] Best way to backup 3TB of data daily?<BR><BR>It's not =
possible a " limit is 2tb *on a single tape* " because no tape (at<BR>the =
moment) is able to handle such capacity<BR>Max SAIT is 1.2 TB x band<BR>Oth=
erwise, we have customers with 3.2 TB files and we backup them without<BR>p=
roblems.<BR><BR>Sincerely<BR><BR>DATASEC<BR>Javier Gonzalez<BR><BR>-----Ori=
ginal Message-----<BR>From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu<BR>[<A =
href=3D"mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu]">mailto:veritas-bu-=
admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]</A> On Behalf Of Michael 
L.<BR>Barrow<BR>Sent=
: Freitag, 20. Mai 2005 16:00<BR>To: Kennedy, Jeffrey<BR>Cc: Sto RageC; =
Piszcz, Justin; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR>Subject: Re: =
[Veritas-bu] Best way to backup 3TB of data daily?<BR><BR>Kennedy, Jeffrey =
wrote:<BR>&gt; The limit of 1tb is actually not correct anymore.&nbsp; =
It's not an NDMP <BR>&gt; stream limit either.&nbsp; We were worried about =
this as well but our <BR>&gt; operations have confirmed the limit is 2tb =
*on a single tape*, not a <BR>&gt; stream.&nbsp; Something to do with how =
much it can track in a single <BR>&gt; location, or something like =
that.<BR>&gt; <BR><BR>That doesn't seem to be accurate based on this =
alert:<BR>&lt;<A href=3D"http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/273806.htm";>h=
ttp://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/273806.htm</A>&gt;<BR><BR>So, which is =
the truth?<BR><BR>--<BR>Michael L. Barrow<BR>&lt;michael AT michaelbarrow DOT 
name=
&gt;<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Veritas-bu =
maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><A 
href=3D"http=
://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu">http://mailman.eng.a=
uburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A><BR><BR><BR><BR>__________________=
_____________________________<BR>Veritas-bu maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; =
Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><A 
href=3D"http://mailman.eng.auburn.e=
du/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu">http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listi=
nfo/veritas-bu</A><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>

--=__Part0427C5B8.2__=--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>