[Veritas-bu] Tidal Enterprise Scheduler

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5563F.A95C6420
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all,

The powers-that-be in our office would like to implement the Veritas =
Netbackup plugin for the Tidal Enterprise Scheduler to "handle" our =
backup procedures.  We're currently using NBU 4.5 FP6, but will be =
upgrading to version 5.0 sometime in the next few months.  Does anyone =
out there have any opinions about Tidal, and whether it's in our better =
interest to either use it or forgo it?

Thanks in advance,
Skip
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5563F.A95C6420
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1498" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT face=3DArial>Hello all,</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT face=3DArial></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT face=3DArial>The powers-that-be in our office =
would like=20
to implement the Veritas Netbackup plugin for the Tidal Enterprise =
Scheduler to=20
"handle" our backup procedures.&nbsp; We're currently using NBU 4.5 FP6, =
but=20
will be upgrading to version 5.0 sometime in the next few months.&nbsp; =
Does=20
anyone out there have any opinions about Tidal, and whether it's in our =
better=20
interest to either use it or forgo it?</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT face=3DArial></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT face=3DArial>Thanks in =
advance,</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT =
face=3DArial>Skip</FONT></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5563F.A95C6420--