Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Re: Two Masters One Library

2005-02-03 17:10:21
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re: Two Masters One Library
From: tekkdude AT yahoo DOT com (J R)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:10:21 -0800 (PST)
You have to set up an Inventory filter. It is
discussed on page 445 of the Media Manager Guide for
Unix. I am sure it is also covered in the Windows
guide. It is under the ACS configuration section.


--- veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote:

> Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to
>       veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 
>
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
>       veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. RE: Disk Staging & Storage Unit Groups (Weber,
> Philip)
>    2. Two Masters One Library (Lee, Kenneth (SBS
> US))
>    3. RE: Two Masters One Library (Len Boyle)
>    4. RE: Two Masters One Library (Lee, Kenneth (SBS
> US))
>    5. Re: Disk Staging & Storage Unit Groups (Rob
> Worman)
>    6. Re: bpdbjobs -most_columns: field
> descriptions? (David Rock)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> From: "Weber, Philip" <Philip.Weber AT egg DOT com>
> To: "'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'"
>        <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging & Storage
> Unit Groups
> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:35:15 -0000 
> 
> Another coupld of questions :
> 
> 1. Is it possible to make it disk stage to more than
> one tape drive in
> parallel, i.e. multistream?  It seems like one disk
> staging area will only
> use one tape drive at a time, which is a shame.
> 
> 2. Do multiple retentions get duplicated to the same
> tape?  Seems to me that
> now we have set some infinite-retention backup
> schedules, all of our tapes
> are going to be infinite-retention.
> 
> Thanks, Phil
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Keating
> [mailto:pkeating AT bank-banque-canada DOT ca] 
> Sent: 03 February 2005 13:22
> To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging & Storage
> Unit Groups
> 
> 
> In theory, I agree...in practice, I haven't found it
> worked that well..
> :o(
> 
> The reason I'm having issues is due to only having a
> 90 Gig DSSU. To
> backup 5 machines, each with around 15-20 gigs of
> data......(total of
> all 5 is about 80 gigs.)
> 
> However, we're using the DSSU (comprised of left
> over un allocated space
> on a couple disks) to back these machines up over a
> 10M excrypted link,
> which only passes about 300KB/s, and we can't afford
> to have these 5
> machines consume a tape drive for 20+ hours for full
> backups.
> 
> We do have a Enterprise storage solution going
> online in Q3, so
> hopefully I'll get a SAN attached Terabyte DSSU
> then!
> ;o)
> 
> Paul
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rob Worman (home) [mailto:rob AT worman DOT org] 
> > Sent: February 2, 2005 10:14 PM
> > To: Paul Keating
> > Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging & Storage
> Unit Groups
> > 
> > 
> > Paul: "It is a good idea to have fulls and
> incrementals go to 
> > different 
> > DSU's"
> > If a backup to a DSSU encounters a diskfull error,
> the 
> > following results:
> >     (1) pause the backup
> >     (2) expire up to two [this number was recently
> upped to 
> > ten] of the 
> > oldest images that have been duped to tape
> >     (2a) if there are no images to expire in (2),
> fail the 
> > backup with 
> > an 84
> >     (3) resume the backup;  if another diskfull
> condition occurs, see 
> > step (1)
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  - 
> Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> -----------------------------------------
> Egg is a trading name of the Egg group of companies
> which includes: Egg plc
> (reg no 2448340), Egg Financial Products ltd (reg no
> 3319027), Egg
> International ltd (reg no 4059266), Egg Financial
> Intermediation ltd (reg
> no 382828), Egg Investments ltd (reg no 3403963) and
> Egg Banking plc (reg
> no 2999842.  Egg Investments Ltd, Egg Banking plc
> and Egg Financial
> Intermediation Ltd are authorised and regulated by
> the Financial Services
> Authority (FSA) and are entered in the FSA register
> under numbers 190518,
> 205621 and 309551 respectively. These members of the
> Egg group are
> registered in England and Wales. Registered offices:
> 1 Waterhouse Square,
> 138-142 Holborn, London EC1N 2NA.    This e-mail is
> confidential and for
> use by the addressee only.  If you are not the
> intended recipient of this
> e-mail and have received it in error, please return
> the message to the
> sender by replying to it and then delete it from
> your mailbox.  Internet
> e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Egg group of
> companies do not
> accept responsibility for changes made to this
> message after it was sent.
> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid
> the transmission of
> viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient
> to ensure that the
> onward transmission, opening or use of this message
> and any attachments
> will not adversely affect its systems or data. No
> responsibility is
> accepted by the Egg group of companies in this
> regard and the recipient
> should carry out such virus and other checks as it
> considers appropriate.
> This communication does not create or modify any
> contract.
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 2
> From: "Lee, Kenneth (SBS US)"
> <kenneth.lee AT siemens DOT com>
> To: "'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'"
>        <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:49:17 -0500 
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Two Masters One Library
> 
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail
> reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be
> legible.
> 
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C50A20.EEFC8F0C
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> Has anybody have an environment where you have two
> master servers accessing
> the same ACS tape library?  How do you handle the
> tapes so that one master
> server does not grab the tapes used by the second
> master server?
> 
=== message truncated ===


=====
"A wise man once said 'Wherever you go, there you are'"
      -Mike Brady

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Veritas-bu] Re: Two Masters One Library, J R <=