Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] help with required licenses for nbu and EMC NAS and SAN

2004-11-25 23:38:49
Subject: [Veritas-bu] help with required licenses for nbu and EMC NAS and SAN
From: tech2187 AT yahoo DOT com (K Chapman)
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 20:38:49 -0800 (PST)
we have a similar config:  cx700 with ns702g
we have one ndmp license, and as long as you are not
going to use sso, you wont need to re-license your
already existing clients.

--- "Broun, Bevan" <brounb AT adi-limited DOT com> wrote:

> Hi All
> 
> I have had difficulty getting information from our
> software vendor on what
> licenses we would need to backup a EMC NAS and SAN.
> 
> We are currently running Netbackup Data Centre 4.5
> on windows. We also
> Bussiness server 4.5 on solaris. However, we are
> licensed to upgrade to 5.1
> and I intend to move everything a RedHat ES 3.0
> server.
> 
> We are expecting to use an EMC CX500. Only a couple
> of hosts will be fibre
> attached to this box and these hosts are already
> licenses clients. The
> other piece of EMC equipment is a NS702G NAS header.
> The NAS will also be
> fibre attached to the SAN.
> 
> The tape library is a dual drive Compaq MSL5026.
> Currently this is attached
> to the Bussiness server on the Sun via SCSI. This
> library can have a fibre
> channel PCI, but doesnt at the moment. The intended
> switches are McData
> DS-24Ms. Im not sure if I can attach this libary to
> the switch or not.
> 
> Can anyone explain what licenses I might be up for?
> Is it just one NDMP
> license for the NS702G? Do servers fibre attached to
> the CX500 need any
> special license?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> BB
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  - 
> Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 


=====
aaarrrggghhh!!!!
FreeBSD rocks


        
                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>