The main reason to use the SSO is whether you have a big amount of
data on the server. Whwn you install a new media in this server and use the
SSO, you should do a tunning in this new media server to obtain a best
performance.

T+

Carlos Alberto Lima dos Santos 
Eng. de Computação
Campinas-SP - Brasil
* carlos_listas AT yahoo.com DOT br


-----Mensagem original-----
De: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] Em nome de Hart, Charles
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 3 de novembro de 2004 13:29
Para: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Assunto: [Veritas-bu] Windows File / Print and SSO

Was wondering what people thoughts are using SSO on Windows file / print
server.  We have setup quite a few Winnows File servers with the SSO option
and not seeing the real benefit.  Our environment is using a Sunv480 as the
master / media SAN attached  9940B Drives in a STK L700 Library.  What we
have seen  variable backup through put from 10-25MBs a second using
Multithread and Multiplex, and restores of Windows file servers at 1-4MBs
(most likely due to a multiplex setting of 6)

I have done some initial testing backing up Windows file server via a GigE
connection, which to this point equals the throughput from the SSO configs
but with out the complexity or futtsyness of the SSO on Windows.  In my mind
it seems that SSO is great for DB and E-Mail servers, but I don't see the
value using SSO on Windows file servers.

Anyone have any input or thoughts?

Thanks a bunch!

Charles 




_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu