Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Unix backup performance...

2004-11-09 10:31:37
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Unix backup performance...
From: scoco AT arl.army DOT mil (Coco, Samuel (Cont, ARL/CISD))
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 10:31:37 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C4C671.33FE7E51
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

700 * 3 =3D 2,100 KB/sec.  It looks as if you're running either a 10MB
line and/or have the duplex set to auto or even to half duplex. I'm
supprised that you don't want to use optimizations - we have seen
significant improvements with them.  Also, streaming to one drive is not
productive.  We currently have a mix of over 129 servers (SUN, SGI, W2K,
and RH LINUX) running and we saw thruput as high as 44,089.00 KB/sec on
todays run.
=20
Thank you,
=20
=20
Samuel J. Coco, STG
Functional Area Manager, ARL
Sr UNIX Administrator
BELL      301 394-1151 DSN 290
CELL (B) 240 398-7121 / (H)443 496-1623
HOME     410 604-2415
Email  scoco AT arl.army DOT mil

        -----Original Message-----
        From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Marx,
Keath
        Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 10:05 AM
        To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
        Subject: [Veritas-bu] Unix backup performance...
=09
=09

        We just added 3 Solaris8 systems to our backup.  What changes
need to be made to produce reasonable performance?  I am running a test
backup now.

        The Master is a Quad Windows2000 SP4 running NBU Datacenter
4.5_FP6

        The Media servers is a Dual Windows2000 SP4 running NBU
Datacenter 4.5_FP6.  It has a Dell PV-132t with 2 Gen 2 LTO Drives in
it.  I have all 3 machines streaming to a single drive.  I am getting
~700 kbs each.

        The clients are Sun Solaris8 machines running the NBU 4.5_FP6
client.

        We get a higher throughput from our windows clients.  We have
*no* files and buffers optimizations done and at this point really don't
want to go down that road.  They are backing up via the network.

        Thanks


        CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise be
protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.=20


------_=_NextPart_001_01C4C671.33FE7E51
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1476" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D339452315-09112004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>700 *=20
3 =3D 2,100 KB/sec.&nbsp; It looks as if you're running either a 10MB =
line and/or=20
have the duplex set to auto or even to half duplex. I'm supprised that =
you don't=20
want to use optimizations - we have seen significant improvements with=20
them.&nbsp; Also, streaming to one drive is not productive.&nbsp; We =
currently=20
have a mix of over 129 servers (SUN, SGI, W2K, and RH LINUX) running and =

we&nbsp;saw thruput as high as 44,089.00 KB/sec on todays=20
run.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thank you,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Samuel J. Coco, =
STG</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Functional Area Manager,=20
ARL</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Sr UNIX =
Administrator</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>BELL&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
&nbsp; 301=20
394-1151 DSN 290</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>CELL (B) 240 398-7121 / =
(H)443=20
496-1623</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>HOME&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 410=20
604-2415</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Email&nbsp; <A=20
href=3D"mailto:scoco AT arl.army DOT mil">scoco AT arl.army DOT 
mil</A></FONT></DIV></D=
IV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV></DIV>
  <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr =
align=3Dleft><FONT=20
  face=3DTahoma size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
  veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu=20
  [mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] <B>On Behalf Of =
</B>Marx,=20
  Keath<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, November 09, 2004 10:05 =
AM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
  veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Veritas-bu] Unix 
=
backup=20
  performance...<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <P align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2>We just =
added=20
  3</FONT><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2></FONT> <FONT =
face=3DArial=20
  color=3D#000080 size=3D2>Solaris8 systems to our backup.&nbsp; What =
changes need=20
  to be made to produce reasonable performance?&nbsp; I am running a =
test backup=20
  now.</FONT></P>
  <P align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2>The Master =
is a Quad=20
  Windows2000 SP4 running NBU Datacenter 4.5_FP6</FONT></P>
  <P align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2>The Media =
servers is=20
  a</FONT><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2> Dual Windows2000 =
SP4 running=20
  NBU Datacenter 4.5_FP6.&nbsp; It has a Dell PV</FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
  color=3D#000080 size=3D2>-132t with 2 Gen 2 LTO Drives in it.&nbsp; I =
have all 3=20
  machines streaming to a single drive.&nbsp; I am getting ~700 kbs=20
  each.</FONT></P>
  <P align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2>The =
clients are Sun=20
  Solaris8 machines running the NBU 4.5_FP6 client.</FONT></P>
  <P align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2>We get a =
higher</FONT>=20
  <FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2>throughput</FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
  color=3D#000080 size=3D2> from our windows clients.&nbsp; We have=20
  *</FONT><B></B><B><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 =
size=3D2>no</FONT></B><FONT=20
  face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2>* files and buffers =
optimizations done and at=20
  this point really don</FONT><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080=20
  size=3D2>'</FONT><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2>t want to =
go down that=20
  road.&nbsp; They are backing up via the network.</FONT></P>
  <P align=3Dleft><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080=20
  size=3D2>Thanks</FONT></P><BR>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail =
message,=20
  including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended =
recipient(s)=20
  and may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise =
be=20
  protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or =
distribution is=20
  prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the =
sender=20
  by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.=20
</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C4C671.33FE7E51--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>