[Veritas-bu] LTO G2 requirements?
2004-06-18 11:13:35
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C45546.D35E2DE8
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On a Dell 6650 with 2.5 Ghz processors it's 0.25 to 0.5 procs per tape =
drive, 250 MB mem per drive if running W2K.
(from the folks at Dell and Veritas)
=20
David Spearman
County of Henrico, Va.
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl.Rossing AT federated DOT ca [mailto:Karl.Rossing AT federated DOT ca]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 11:07
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO G2 requirements?
We run two LTO2 drives on a Dual Processor SUN e250 with 512MB of ram.=20
We are not doing multiplexing. We are just writting to both tapes at the =
same time.=20
I'd like to see another 512MB(1GB total) of ram, but it runs ok on =
512MB.=20
1/1G seems high, but maybe that's for a windows system.=20
veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 06/17/2004 02:56:54 PM:
> I read somewhere that Gen 2 LTO drives require 1 processor and =BD gig
> of ram each. Is that a valid set of requirements? Is their a=20
> better guideline?=20
------_=_NextPart_001_01C45546.D35E2DE8
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>On a=20
Dell 6650 with 2.5 Ghz processors it's 0.25 to 0.5 procs per tape drive, =
250 MB=20
mem per drive if running W2K.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>(from=20
the folks at Dell and Veritas)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>David=20
Spearman</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>County=20
of Henrico, Va.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> =
Karl.Rossing AT federated DOT ca=20
[mailto:Karl.Rossing AT federated DOT ca]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, June 18, =
2004=20
11:07<BR><B>Cc:</B> =
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:=20
[Veritas-bu] LTO G2 requirements?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR><FONT=20
face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>We run two LTO2 drives on a Dual Processor =
SUN e250=20
with 512MB of ram.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>We =
are not=20
doing multiplexing. We are just writting to both tapes at the same=20
time.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>I'd like to see =
another=20
512MB(1GB total) of ram, but it runs ok on 512MB.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT =
face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>1/1G seems high, but maybe that's for a =
windows=20
system.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT=20
size=3D2><TT>veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on =
06/17/2004=20
02:56:54 PM:<BR><BR>> I read somewhere that Gen 2 LTO drives =
require 1=20
processor and =BD gig<BR>> of ram each. Is that a valid set =
of=20
requirements? Is their a <BR>> better guideline?</TT></FONT>=20
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C45546.D35E2DE8--
|
|
|