This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 005314E986256EB7_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We run two LTO2 drives on a Dual Processor SUN e250 with 512MB of ram.

We are not doing multiplexing. We are just writting to both tapes at the=20
same time.

I'd like to see another 512MB(1GB total) of ram, but it runs ok on 512MB.

1/1G seems high, but maybe that's for a windows system.

veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 06/17/2004 02:56:54 PM:

> I read somewhere that Gen 2 LTO drives require 1 processor and =BD gig
> of ram each.  Is that a valid set of requirements?  Is their a=20
> better guideline?

--=_alternative 005314E986256EB7_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">We run two LTO2 drives on a Dual Pro=
cessor
SUN e250 with 512MB of ram.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">We are not doing multiplexing. We are
just writting to both tapes at the same time.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">I'd like to see another 512MB(1GB to=
tal)
of ram, but it runs ok on 512MB.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">1/1G seems high, but maybe that's for
a windows system.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2><tt>veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 
06/=
17/2004
02:56:54 PM:<br>
<br>
&gt; I read somewhere that Gen 2 LTO drives require 1 processor and =BD gig=
<br>
&gt; of ram each. &nbsp;Is that a valid set of requirements? &nbsp;Is their
a <br>
&gt; better guideline?</tt></font>
<br>
--=_alternative 005314E986256EB7_=--