Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] We all need some feed back on NBU 5.0

2004-04-19 11:53:12
Subject: [Veritas-bu] We all need some feed back on NBU 5.0
From: Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA (Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:53:12 -0500
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 005744B786256E7B_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 04/19/2004 09:19:47 AM:

> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:17:24AM -0400, Bobby R Windle wrote:
> > Please, if you have any experiences both good or bad in or around
> > moving from NB4.5  to NB5.0, please express your concerns or praises.
> > This is an important issue that we all need to hear about.  There have
> > been a lot of different takes on this. Try to keep it constructive and
> > fair.  New products will always have fixes..  otherwise we would all
> > be home fixing toasters.
> 
> We're fighting a significant battle with NBU 5.0 MP1 right now.  It
> seems like the host-based include/exclude processing for our Solaris
> clients isn't working at all and all files are being backed up all the
> time - we've had dozens of the same files being backed up when we should
> have had only 1.  We have a support ticket open with Veritas on this.

Wow, I'm glad i'm still on 5.0GA.

The two problems i ran into are:

1) VSP is enabled by default on 5.0. I never dealt with VSP on 4.5MP5. 
Apparently VSP appeared on 4.5FP5.

2) Windows clients were getting alot of 25 errors. had to "/usr/sbin/ndd 
-set /dev/tcp tcp_time_wait_interval 1000" on our solaris master.

 Oh yea... The windows admin console tends to disappear/crash, which is 
odd since xp doesn't notice and doesn't a crash report to microsoft. But 
this i can live with.
--=_alternative 005744B786256E7B_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2><tt>veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 
04/19/2004
09:19:47 AM:<br>
<br>
&gt; On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:17:24AM -0400, Bobby R Windle wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; Please, if you have any experiences both good or bad in or around<br>
&gt; &gt; moving from NB4.5 &nbsp;to NB5.0, please express your concerns
or praises.<br>
&gt; &gt; This is an important issue that we all need to hear about. &nbsp;There
have<br>
&gt; &gt; been a lot of different takes on this. Try to keep it constructive
and<br>
&gt; &gt; fair. &nbsp;New products will always have fixes.. &nbsp;otherwise
we would all<br>
&gt; &gt; be home fixing toasters.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; We're fighting a significant battle with NBU 5.0 MP1 right now. 
&nbsp;It<br>
&gt; seems like the host-based include/exclude processing for our Solaris<br>
&gt; clients isn't working at all and all files are being backed up all
the<br>
&gt; time - we've had dozens of the same files being backed up when we
should<br>
&gt; have had only 1. &nbsp;We have a support ticket open with Veritas
on this.<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>Wow, I'm glad i'm still on 5.0GA.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>The two problems i ran into are:</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>1) VSP is enabled by default on 5.0. I never dealt
with VSP on 4.5MP5. Apparently VSP appeared on 4.5FP5.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>2) Windows clients were getting alot of 25 errors.
had to &quot;/usr/sbin/ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_time_wait_interval 1000&quot;
on our solaris master.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>&nbsp;Oh yea... The windows admin console tends to
disappear/crash, which is odd since xp doesn't notice and doesn't a crash
report to microsoft. But this i can live with.</tt></font>
--=_alternative 005744B786256E7B_=--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>