Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Fully Qualified Domain Names

2004-04-13 14:57:02
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Fully Qualified Domain Names
From: jking AT hnl.bcm.tmc DOT edu (Justin King)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:57:02 -0500
Yes.  In fact, all of my Linux clients stopped working due to a fqdn/shortname 
issue when I upgraded to 5.0.  Make SURE you also have reverse lookups for all 
your clients and servers.  I had a few missing that caused me 2-3 hours of 
grief.

________________________________________
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-admin 
AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of steven_w_miller AT non.agilent DOT 
com
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 1:27 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Fully Qualified Domain Names

Has anyone seen issues with using shortnames and administering NBU 4.5 or 5.0.. 
I remember awhile back that Veritas told me to use fully qualified names, but 
can't remember the exact reasons. I've seen some wierd problems with the Java 
GUI on 5.0 when I didn't use fully qualified names, such as the device monitor 
not updating properly. This seems to only be an issue with the Java GUI and 
didn't see the same issues with the Windows Admin Console.
Steve Miller
Sr. Storage Engineer

VMC Consulting Corporation
for Agilent Technologies
IT | information technology
1900 Garden of the Gods Rd
Colorado Springs, CO  80907

719.590.2420 | office
www.vmc.com 
 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>