Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Re-evaluating policies

2004-02-26 09:28:11
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re-evaluating policies
From: irodriguez AT arsenaldigital DOT com (Isidro Rodriguez)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:28:11 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3FC74.C31401A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

 
cat /usr/openv/netbackup/db/media/errors -- if you are unix.....i am not
sure if this exists on windows...it should
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lewick, Taylor [mailto:tlewick AT hrblock DOT com]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 9:05 AM
To: larry.kingery AT veritas DOT com; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Re-evaluating policies



Does anyone know of a way to show only the tapes that failed in the past X
hours due to a meida error, or by a certain status.
I would like to see if the same tapes are having repeated media errors so I
know if I should get rid of them...

Taylor


-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu on behalf of Larry Kingery
Sent: Wed 2/25/2004 6:49 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re-evaluating policies

> Hi Netbackup Guru's!
>
> I am about to embark on upgrading to Netbackup 5. I thought it might
> be a very good time to re-evaluate our policy configurations and see
> if there is anyway to improve the current system and make it more
> simple and easier to use. I would like to ask a few questions to see
> what you guru's think.
>
> Our configuration is fairly simple. About thirty Unix clients
> connecting to an Sun L25. Four of the servers connect to a couple of
> A5000 arrays that host application data.
>
> With this in mind each system will have its own schedule for system
> backups that run weekly and another schedule for application backups
> that run daily. We have virtual IP addresses for applications so I
> use the virtual IP in its own policy, so in affect I have three
> 'kinds' of policies.
>
> So my first question is, can I consolidate the system backups into
> one policy? Is this recommended? The systems will always have / and
> /var but not always have /usr - will I need to split the policy
> dependent on which partitions I have? This would reduce the number
> of polices from thirty to one!

You can use / as the file list and choose "Cross Mount Points".

Then, for your machines with clustered applications, create and
exclude list (policy specific) on each client to exclude the shared
filesystems.

>
> The other question is relating to tape rotation. In NB3.4 figuring
> out which tapes have been written to was a complete nightmare and I

bpmedialist, available_media, or vmquery (look for "Time Assigned"
value) would all do the trick.  See also bpimagelist -media if you
want to know media used in the last N hours or something.

> eventually wrote a shell script to automatically figure out which
> tapes had been used and emailed the operator which was fine, the
> only issue I had was that new tapes that have been used in a volume
> pool got put back into the same volume pool and was unavailable to
> the other pools unless you moved them using another script - seams
> like a little bit of a fudge to me! Does anyone know if tape
> rotation has been improved in NB5? If not, would anyone like to
> share any shell script with me (as I am sure they are better than my
> badly written shell scripts)!

As of NBU 4.5 FP3, tapes which were pulled from the scratch pool will
be returned to the scratch pool automatically (by default, you can
disable this if you like -- see "RETURN* in the MM SAG index).


>
> I would appreciate any feedback and would be very interested to hear
> how other people have configured and maintained their Netbackup
> environment.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Timothy.




--
Larry Kingery
    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu> 





------_=_NextPart_001_01C3FC74.C31401A0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>RE: [Veritas-bu] Re-evaluating policies</TITLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2>cat 
/usr/openv/netbackup/db/media/errors<SPAN class=397352014-26022004> -- if you 
are unix.....i am not sure if this exists on windows...it 
should</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Lewick, Taylor 
  [mailto:tlewick AT hrblock DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, February 26, 
2004 9:05 
  AM<BR><B>To:</B> larry.kingery AT veritas DOT com; 
  veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Veritas-bu] 
  Re-evaluating policies<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><!-- Converted from text/plain 
format -->
  <P><FONT size=2>Does anyone know of a way to show only the tapes that failed 
  in the past X hours due to a meida error, or by a certain status.<BR>I would 
  like to see if the same tapes are having repeated media errors so I know if I 
  should get rid of them...<BR><BR>Taylor<BR><BR><BR>-----Original 
  Message-----<BR>From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu on 
behalf of 
  Larry Kingery<BR>Sent: Wed 2/25/2004 6:49 PM<BR>To: 
  veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR>Subject: [Veritas-bu] 
Re-evaluating 
  policies<BR><BR>&gt; Hi Netbackup Guru's!<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; I am about to 
embark 
  on upgrading to Netbackup 5. I thought it might<BR>&gt; be a very good time 
to 
  re-evaluate our policy configurations and see<BR>&gt; if there is anyway to 
  improve the current system and make it more<BR>&gt; simple and easier to use. 
  I would like to ask a few questions to see<BR>&gt; what you guru's 
  think.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; Our configuration is fairly simple. About thirty Unix 
  clients<BR>&gt; connecting to an Sun L25. Four of the servers connect to a 
  couple of<BR>&gt; A5000 arrays that host application data.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; 
  With this in mind each system will have its own schedule for system<BR>&gt; 
  backups that run weekly and another schedule for application backups<BR>&gt; 
  that run daily. We have virtual IP addresses for applications so I<BR>&gt; 
use 
  the virtual IP in its own policy, so in affect I have three<BR>&gt; 'kinds' 
of 
  policies.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; So my first question is, can I consolidate the 
  system backups into<BR>&gt; one policy? Is this recommended? The systems will 
  always have / and<BR>&gt; /var but not always have /usr - will I need to 
split 
  the policy<BR>&gt; dependent on which partitions I have? This would reduce 
the 
  number<BR>&gt; of polices from thirty to one!<BR><BR>You can use / as the 
file 
  list and choose "Cross Mount Points".<BR><BR>Then, for your machines with 
  clustered applications, create and<BR>exclude list (policy specific) on each 
  client to exclude the shared<BR>filesystems.<BR><BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; The other 
  question is relating to tape rotation. In NB3.4 figuring<BR>&gt; out which 
  tapes have been written to was a complete nightmare and I<BR><BR>bpmedialist, 
  available_media, or vmquery (look for "Time Assigned"<BR>value) would all do 
  the trick.&nbsp; See also bpimagelist -media if you<BR>want to know media 
used 
  in the last N hours or something.<BR><BR>&gt; eventually wrote a shell script 
  to automatically figure out which<BR>&gt; tapes had been used and emailed the 
  operator which was fine, the<BR>&gt; only issue I had was that new tapes that 
  have been used in a volume<BR>&gt; pool got put back into the same volume 
pool 
  and was unavailable to<BR>&gt; the other pools unless you moved them using 
  another script - seams<BR>&gt; like a little bit of a fudge to me! Does 
anyone 
  know if tape<BR>&gt; rotation has been improved in NB5? If not, would anyone 
  like to<BR>&gt; share any shell script with me (as I am sure they are better 
  than my<BR>&gt; badly written shell scripts)!<BR><BR>As of NBU 4.5 FP3, tapes 
  which were pulled from the scratch pool will<BR>be returned to the scratch 
  pool automatically (by default, you can<BR>disable this if you like -- see 
  "RETURN* in the MM SAG index).<BR><BR><BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; I would appreciate any 
  feedback and would be very interested to hear<BR>&gt; how other people have 
  configured and maintained their Netbackup<BR>&gt; 
environment.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; 
  Thanks,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; Timothy.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>--<BR>Larry 
  Kingery<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked 
  into jet 
  engines<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Veritas-bu 
  maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><A 
  
href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu";>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A><BR><BR><BR></FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3FC74.C31401A0--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>