[Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
2003-06-23 12:44:15
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput |
From: |
lfafard AT saskpower DOT com (Lowell Fafard) |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:44:15 -0600 |
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 005BF15406256D4E_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What are you using for your tape devices? How are they connected? What=20
is the network speed to the Media Server? Are there multple clients being =
backed up to this media server at the same time?
Lowell
"Moses, Darby" <DMoses AT leviton DOT com>
Sent by: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
2003-06-23 10:10 AM
=20
To: "Quarantine" <Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG>,
<[email protected]=
ng.auburn.edu>
cc:=20
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
But should the differences be that large? I have another client that will =
ftp to the Veritas server at 15,000KB/s but the Veritas backup is=20
1000KB/s.=20
Thanks,
Darby Moses
Operations
Leviton Mfg.
-----Original Message-----
From: Quarantine [mailto:Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG]=20
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Moses, Darby; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
You shouldn't expect that. Different methods of file access and transfer=20
have different overheads. For example, download a large FTP file from an=20
off-network location using Internet Explorer and then download the same=20
file using a standard FTP client like WS=5FFTP. You'll usually see a marke=
d=20
difference. Another comparison is to copy a very large file between=20
Windows machines using copy/paste from the GUI and then copy the same file =
using a utility like robocopy. Windows file handling is notoriously=20
inefficient and slow.
Matt
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
From: Moses, Darby [mailto:DMoses AT leviton DOT com]=20
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Veritas-BackUp support group
If I can transfer a file using FTP=A0from my=A0Veritas server to a client a=
t=20
5000 KB/s should I get better than the 1200KB/s throughput I get from=20
NetBackup for my backups from that client?
=A0
=A0
Regards,
Darby Moses
Operations=20
Leviton Mfg.
Phone: (718) 281-6597 Fax: (718) 281-6999
DMOSES AT LEVITON DOT COM WWW.LEVITON.COM=20
=A0
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
--=_alternative 005BF15406256D4E_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">What are you using for your tape dev=
ices? How are they connected? What is the network speed to the =
Media Server? Are there multple clients being backed up to this media=
server at the same time?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Lowell</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=3D100%>
<tr valign=3Dtop>
<td>
<td><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"><b>"Moses, Darby" <DMos=
es AT leviton DOT com></b></font>
<br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">Sent by: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman DOT
en=
g.auburn.edu</font>
<p><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">2003-06-23 10:10 AM</font>
<br>
<td><font size=3D1 face=3D"Arial"> </font>
<br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"> To: &nbs=
p; "Quarantine" <Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT
ORG>=
, <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu></font>
<br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"> cc: &nbs=
p; </font>
<br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"> Subject:=
RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throug=
hput</font></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New">But should the differences be that =
large? I have another client that will ftp to the Veritas server at 1=
5,000KB/s but the Veritas backup is 1000KB/s. <br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Darby Moses<br>
Operations<br>
Leviton Mfg.<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Quarantine [mailto:Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG] <br>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:19 AM<br>
To: Moses, Darby; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<br>
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput<br>
<br>
<br>
You shouldn't expect that. Different methods of file access and trans=
fer have different overheads. For example, download a large FTP file =
from an off-network location using Internet Explorer and then download the =
same file using a standard FTP client like WS=5FFTP. You'll usually s=
ee a marked difference. Another comparison is to copy a very large fi=
le between Windows machines using copy/paste from the GUI and then copy the=
same file using a utility like robocopy. Windows file handling is no=
toriously inefficient and slow.<br>
<br>
Matt<br>
<br>
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F<br>
From: Moses, Darby [mailto:DMoses AT leviton DOT com] <br>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:10 AM<br>
To: Veritas-BackUp support group<br>
<br>
If I can transfer a file using FTP=A0from my=A0Veritas server to a client a=
t 5000 KB/s should I get better than the 1200KB/s throughput I get from Net=
Backup for my backups from that client?<br>
=A0<br>
=A0<br>
Regards,<br>
Darby Moses<br>
Operations <br>
Leviton Mfg.<br>
Phone: (718) 281-6597 Fax: (718) 281-6999<br>
DMOSES AT LEVITON DOT COM WWW.LEVITON.COM <br>
=A0<br>
<br>
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F<br>
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<br>
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
--=_alternative 005BF15406256D4E_=--
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Quarantine
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, David Chapa
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Quarantine
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Donaldson, Mark
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput,
Lowell Fafard <=
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Donaldson, Mark
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
|
|
|