[Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
2003-06-23 11:19:10
You shouldn't expect that. Different methods of file access and transfer
have different overheads. For example, download a large FTP file from an
off-network location using Internet Explorer and then download the same file
using a standard FTP client like WS_FTP. You'll usually see a marked
difference. Another comparison is to copy a very large file between Windows
machines using copy/paste from the GUI and then copy the same file using a
utility like robocopy. Windows file handling is notoriously inefficient and
slow.
Matt
________________________________________
From: Moses, Darby [mailto:DMoses AT leviton DOT com]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Veritas-BackUp support group
If I can transfer a file using FTP from my Veritas server to a client at
5000 KB/s should I get better than the 1200KB/s throughput I get from
NetBackup for my backups from that client?
Regards,
Darby Moses
Operations
Leviton Mfg.
Phone: (718) 281-6597 Fax: (718) 281-6999
DMOSES AT LEVITON DOT COM WWW.LEVITON.COM
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput,
Quarantine <=
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, David Chapa
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Quarantine
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Donaldson, Mark
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Lowell Fafard
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Donaldson, Mark
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
|
|
|