Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Re:To FP or not to FP?

2003-05-08 10:41:34
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re:To FP or not to FP?
From: Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG (Quarantine)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 10:41:34 -0400
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3156F.EC540BB0
Content-Type: text/plain

I also like the ability to mix media server versions and to back up just the
public folders in Exchange.  We intentionally don't back up mailboxes.
Previously I had to replicate public folders to an Exchange server that
contained no mailboxes and back it up.  Not very elegant, but it worked.
 
Matt


  _____  

From: Mike Kelczewski [mailto:KELCZ AT coj DOT net] 
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 10:20 AM
To: dritschel62 AT yahoo DOT com
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu


See the release notes:
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/254498.htm
<http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/254498.htm> 
 
My major reason to go with the FP over MP was expired tapes automatically go
into the scratch pool,  ability to push Novell clients(untested as of yet),
and special reports in Vault for Iron Mountain.
 
 
Michael Kelczewski
Senior Application Analyst - Computer Operations
City of Jacksonville
Information Technologies Division
220 E. Bay St., Suite 200
City HAll Annex
Jacksonville, FL  32202
904-630-1079,   Fax 904-630-2764
kelcz AT coj DOT net <mailto:kelcz AT coj DOT net> 

>>> Douglas Ritschel <dritschel62 AT yahoo DOT com> 05/08/03 09:23AM >>>
What is the advantage of going with the FP rather than
the MP? 




------_=_NextPart_001_01C3156F.EC540BB0
Content-Type: text/html

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">


<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN-TOP: 2px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px">
<DIV><SPAN class=763253914-08052003>I also like the ability to mix media server 
versions and to back up just the public folders in Exchange.&nbsp; We 
intentionally don't back up mailboxes.&nbsp; Previously I had to replicate 
public folders to an Exchange server that contained no mailboxes and back it 
up.&nbsp; Not very elegant, but it worked.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=763253914-08052003></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=763253914-08052003>Matt</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> Mike Kelczewski [mailto:KELCZ AT coj DOT net] 
<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 08, 2003 10:20 AM<BR><B>To:</B> 
dritschel62 AT yahoo DOT com<BR><B>Cc:</B> 
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left>See the release notes:<BR><A 
href="http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/254498.htm";>http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/254498.htm</A></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>My major&nbsp;reason to go with the FP over MP was expired tapes 
automatically go into the scratch pool,&nbsp; ability to push Novell 
clients(untested as of yet), and special reports in Vault for Iron 
Mountain.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Michael Kelczewski<BR>Senior Application Analyst - Computer 
Operations<BR>City of Jacksonville<BR>Information Technologies Division<BR>220 
E. Bay St., Suite 200<BR>City HAll Annex<BR>Jacksonville, FL&nbsp; 
32202<BR>904-630-1079,&nbsp;&nbsp; Fax 904-630-2764<BR><A 
href="mailto:kelcz AT coj DOT net">kelcz AT coj DOT net</A></DIV>
<DIV><BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; Douglas Ritschel &lt;dritschel62 AT yahoo DOT com&gt; 
05/08/03 
09:23AM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>What is the advantage of going with the FP rather 
than<BR>the MP? <BR><BR><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3156F.EC540BB0--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>