Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] FP3 stability

2003-04-18 12:42:51
Subject: [Veritas-bu] FP3 stability
From: Mike.Wilkinson AT pegs DOT com (Wilkinson, Mike)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:42:51 -0700
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C305C9.8D688AF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

We are running FP3, but we just converted directly from 3.4. So far it's
been more reliable than 3.4 ever was, but we really have not pushed it too
hard yet. I'm not too keen on the java stuff yet; there was a case a few
weeks ago where we had two java processes using 4GB of memory each, and I'm
seeing one right now connected to a user session that is using 3.7GB of
memory right now. Maybe someone can confirm if that is normal, since all the
other are running around 100M or less.
 
- MW

-----Original Message-----
From: Donaldson, Mark [mailto:Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Veritasbu (E-mail)
Subject: [Veritas-bu] FP3 stability



Is there any issues with FP3 stability?  There was some early comments on
this maillist of Java processes spawned that didn't die. I've installed MP3
but was waiting on more word from this community as to FP3 feature
stability.

Anyone?  Bueller? 


------_=_NextPart_001_01C305C9.8D688AF0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>FP3 stability</TITLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2462.0" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=401392816-18042003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>We 
are 
running FP3, but we just converted directly from 3.4. So far it's been more 
reliable than 3.4 ever was, but we really have not pushed it too hard yet. I'm 
not too keen on the java stuff yet; there was a case a few weeks ago where we 
had two java processes using 4GB of memory each, and I'm seeing one right now 
connected to a user session that is using 3.7GB of memory right now. Maybe 
someone can confirm if that is normal, since all the other are running around 
100M or less.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=401392816-18042003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=401392816-18042003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>- 
MW</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Donaldson, Mark 
  [mailto:Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, April 
18, 2003 
  8:50 AM<BR><B>To:</B> Veritasbu (E-mail)<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Veritas-bu] FP3 
  stability<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <P><FONT size=2>Is there any issues with FP3 stability?&nbsp; There was some 
  early comments on this maillist of Java processes spawned that didn't die. 
  I've installed MP3 but was waiting on more word from this community as to FP3 
  feature stability.</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=2>Anyone?&nbsp; Bueller?</FONT> </P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C305C9.8D688AF0--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>