I've been working with it since version 1.6, so I know what you mean.
I liken it to being married for 60 years (no, I'm not even close to that
yet), at that point it ain't about the beauty but the love.
Even with all its flaws, I just love NetBackup. I love you man! But I'm
not going to say "don't go changin'"
:-)
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
David A. Chapa
DataStaff, Inc.
312-683-1144
http://www.BackupScripts.com
"where script happens"
Post your questions in our forums
Co-Author of
Implementing Backup and Recovery:
The Readiness Guide for the Enterprise
published by John Wiley and Sons
A Veritas Solution Series Publication
ISBN:0471227145
---------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]On Behalf Of Kathryn
Hemness
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 1:41 PM
To: Greenberg, Katherine A
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 4.5 Failing to recognize exclude_list on
Sol
You are right. My comment is based on how NetBackup currently works.
I've been using NetBackup since before Veritas bought it and there
are many features (which I call stupidisms) which I've wished
were fixed or improved. The server-side exclude lists being one
of them; the ability to have more than 2 catalog backup media another.
Veritas has been good about adding support for new platforms and
hardware, but not for improving features. In fact, in the last
release (NetBackup 4.5), they removed very functional motif
interfaces and replaced it with a java pig.
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Greenberg, Katherine A wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:09:26 -0400
> From: "Greenberg, Katherine A" <GreenbergKA AT aetna DOT com>
> To: 'Kathryn Hemness' <kfhemness AT ucdavis DOT edu>,
> veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 4.5 Failing to recognize exclude_list on Sol
>
> Ergo, the software is flawed. Since most of the other products out there
> contain server side exclude lists and these exclude lists are queried
prior
> to the backups being scheduled, the 120 extraneous filesystem job entries
of
> 32KB will never appear.
>
> Katherine Greenberg
> 860.636.6724
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathryn Hemness [mailto:kfhemness AT ucdavis DOT edu]
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 1:55 PM
> To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 4.5 Failing to recognize exclude_list on Sol
>
>
>
> Kate --
>
> I find your logic a bit flawed. NetBackup puts job in the scheduler queue
> right when the backup window opens, even before contacting the client
> system. Since the exclude_list is on the client, the master server doesn't
> even know of its existence until the job actually starts. Having to make
> contact with the client prior to queuing a job would introduce lots of
> delays, which could be horrendous if there were hundreds of clients in a
> backup enterprise.
>
> > Message: 10
> > From: "Greenberg, Katherine A" <GreenbergKA AT aetna DOT com>
> > To: "'fperetmere AT adic DOT com'" <fperetmere AT adic DOT com>,
> > veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 4.5 Failing to recognize exclude_list on
Sol
> > aris
> > Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:05:52 -0400
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > I realized it was (more or less) me being stupid and VERITAS writing
> > crappy software...
> >
> > Here's what I found:
> >
> > Create the /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/bpbkar directory and every file
> > system creates a job, but after each job is created it checks against
> > the Exclude list to determine if that needs to be backed up or not. I
> > was getting confused b/c on this particular system the Exclude list
> > has about 120 filesystems in it and the jobs were still getting
> > *generated*. (It's an ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES variable being passed in the
> > Policy)
> >
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to have Scheduler look to an exclude list
> > before it generates the job list for a particular system?!?!?!?!
> >
> > As always, more fun through NetBackup :)
> >
> > ~Kate
> >
>
> --Kathy
> kfhemness AT ucdavis DOT edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
> think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender by
> reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately. Thank you. Aetna
>
--Kathy
kfhemness AT ucdavis DOT edu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
