This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2F490.48329E20
Content-Type: text/plain
I run both robots on busses sharing a drive. In fact, on the one robot
(L3500), it's hardwired that way by the manufacturer (ATL).
There's almost no traffic to the robotic control, it seems a waste to
dedicate an entire bus for a pittance of bytes zipping back and forth.
$.02
-M
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Walton [mailto:jonw AT n2h2 DOT com]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Donaldson, Mark
Cc: 'Marvin Blackburn'; Veritas--ListServer (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] question about software compression
I have another question regarding differential SCSI busses. The guy that
sold me our StorageTek L80 told me never to put a tape drive and a robot
arm on the same SCSI bus. He could not give me a reason though.
Can someone comment on this?
Thanks,
Jon
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Donaldson, Mark wrote:
> What kind of SCSI bus? Differential? Two drives per bus should be OK
with
> diff. I wonder if HP is giving you excuses for poor firmware? Be sure to
> check those drive firmware versions.
>
> Software compression is SSSSlllllooooowwwww and puts a measurable effect
on
> a client if you usually use multiple streams. In my testing, it seems the
> compression algorithm isn't that tight, a compressed image on disk will
> recompress with "compress" or "gzip" very nicely which shows the algorithm
> is pretty loose. I don't know how well it compares to tape compression
> rates, though.
>
> Avoid software compression if you can, IMO.
> -M
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marvin Blackburn [mailto:mblackburn AT glenraven DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:08 AM
> To: Veritas--ListServer (E-mail)
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] question about software compression
>
>
> We may have to turn off hardware compression on our DLT8000 drives and
move
> the compression to NBU.
> We currently run 3.4.3 against a P3000 ATL Library. We have two drives on
> the same scsi bus and
> HP is telling us that this may saturate the bus and cause hardware errors.
> What kind of performance/time/media consequences should I expect.
>
>
>
> ------------------
> Marvin Blackburn
> Systems Administrator
> Glen Raven
> "He's no failure. He's not dead yet" --William Lloyd George
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2F490.48329E20
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: [Veritas-bu] question about software compression</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I run both robots on busses sharing a drive. In =
fact, on the one robot (L3500), it's hardwired that way by the =
manufacturer (ATL).</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>There's almost no traffic to the robotic control, it =
seems a waste to dedicate an entire bus for a pittance of bytes zipping =
back and forth.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>$.02</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>-M</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: Jon Walton [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:jonw AT n2h2 DOT com">mailto:jonw AT n2h2 DOT com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:28 AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: Donaldson, Mark</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cc: 'Marvin Blackburn'; Veritas--ListServer =
(E-mail)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] question about software =
compression</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I have another question regarding differential SCSI =
busses. The guy that</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>sold me our StorageTek L80 told me never to put a =
tape drive and a robot</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>arm on the same SCSI bus. He could not =
give me a reason though.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Can someone comment on this?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Thanks,</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Jon</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Donaldson, Mark wrote:</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> What kind of SCSI bus? Differential? =
Two drives per bus should be OK with</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> diff. I wonder if HP is giving you =
excuses for poor firmware? Be sure to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> check those drive firmware versions.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Software compression is SSSSlllllooooowwwww and =
puts a measurable effect on</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> a client if you usually use multiple =
streams. In my testing, it seems the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> compression algorithm isn't that tight, a =
compressed image on disk will</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> recompress with "compress" or =
"gzip" very nicely which shows the algorithm</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> is pretty loose. I don't know how well it =
compares to tape compression</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> rates, though.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Avoid software compression if you can, =
IMO.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> -M</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> -----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> From: Marvin Blackburn [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:mblackburn AT glenraven DOT com">mailto:mblackburn AT glenraven
DOT com=
</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:08 AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> To: Veritas--ListServer (E-mail)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Subject: [Veritas-bu] question about software =
compression</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> We may have to turn off hardware compression on =
our DLT8000 drives and move</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> the compression to NBU.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> We currently run 3.4.3 against a P3000 ATL =
Library. We have two drives on</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> the same scsi bus and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> HP is telling us that this may saturate the bus =
and cause hardware errors.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> What kind of performance/time/media =
consequences should I expect.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ------------------</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Marvin Blackburn</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Systems Administrator</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Glen Raven</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> "He's no failure. He's not dead =
yet" --William Lloyd George</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> =
_______________________________________________</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Veritas-bu maillist - =
Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> <A =
HREF=3D"http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu" =
TARGET=3D"_blank">http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas=
-bu</A></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2F490.48329E20--
|