That's true, but nothing can be based on the original failing class since
it's an incremental. The archive bit is reset already. I'll still get all
the files this way - they'll just be in 2 separate places. From my end, the
restore will be seamless since NetBackup handles the media.
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald_Arsenault AT bankone DOT com [mailto:Donald_Arsenault AT bankone
DOT com]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Quarantine; Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com; timothy.arnold AT
becta.org DOT uk;
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Frequency Question
The flaw that I can see with this is that although the re-running of a FULL
backup will be the same as the original, the re-running of an incremental
backup will not be the same.
The incremental backups are based on the class, since you will be running
the "copy" the incremental will be based on the last running of the "copy" ,
not the original failing class.
Donald J. Arsenault
donaldarsenault AT firstusa DOT com
(302)282-7626
fax: (302)594-4020
Storage Management
First USA Bank
201 N. Walnut St.
Wilmington, DE 19801
-----Original Message-----
From: Quarantine [mailto:Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Arsenault, Donald (Card Services); Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com;
timothy.arnold AT becta.org DOT uk; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Frequency Question
I get around this by making copies of all my scheduled classes. I leave the
schedules in place, but delete all the start windows. I can then run manual
backups for problem classes without messing with the frequencies of my
scheduled jobs.
Just for the record, I've seen the guy that did my Veritas training (Freddie
Gilyard) in this list, and he's the origin of this idea. Thanks! :-)
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald_Arsenault AT bankone DOT com [mailto:Donald_Arsenault AT bankone
DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com; timothy.arnold AT becta.org DOT uk;
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Frequency Question
By setting the frequency to 1 day, then if you do a re-run of a failed
backup outside of the original window, there will not be a backup done that
day during the window. Netbackup will say that the backup has been completed
for that day, and you will miss the backup that night.
Donald J. Arsenault
donaldarsenault AT firstusa DOT com
(302)282-7626
fax: (302)594-4020
Storage Management
First USA Bank
201 N. Walnut St.
Wilmington, DE 19801
-----Original Message-----
From: Donaldson, Mark [mailto:Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 1:33 PM
To: 'Timothy Arnold'; Veritasbu (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Frequency Question
Frequency is measured from job start time. It's actually slightly more
complex than that but if you set a 1-day frequency on a set of daily
identical windows, it'll start at the same time each day.
-M
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Arnold [mailto:timothy.arnold AT becta.org DOT uk]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:53 AM
To: 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Frequency Question
Hello again,
I have another question regarding frequencies. If for example I was backing
up a file system between 22:00:00 and 06:00:00 (8 hours) and I wished to do
this every 24 hours, would you set the frequency for 16 Hours so that if the
job started moments before 06:00:00, it could start at 22:00:00 ?
I hope someone can understand what I am trying to say ;)
Cheers,
Tim.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any
reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission
in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you
**********************************************************************
|
