Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Improving Restore Times?

2002-10-23 12:21:03
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Improving Restore Times?
From: Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com (Donaldson, Mark)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:21:03 -0600
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C27AB0.2E897BB0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

Increasing the buffer settings to 256K for our LTO drives resulted in a
nearly doubling of backup speed so, yes, it can have a measurable effect.
Matching SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS to NET_BUFFER_SZ was also beneficial.  
 
Also set the NET_BUFFER_SZ to match on the clients.
 
I haven't played with NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS_RESTORE.
 
-Mark
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: Gravizi, Thomas [mailto:thomas_gravizi AT steris DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:01 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Improving Restore Times?



Greetings, 

We have issues performing restores of many small files.  We are performing
cold backups for our Oracle 11i instances which are about 95 Gig and include
about 575k files.  The backup times is about 3.5-4 hours, which really isn't
an issue.  But, when we try doing a restore, it take between 9-11 hours.  I
do have the Veritas NetBackup Performance Tuning white papers v. 1.51, and
have a few questions about that.  First of all, our indexing level is
already set to 9, so that setting is confirmed.  My next settings would be
the buffer settings.  Has any tried changing these and seen results?  I
looked at the SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS and for some reason they were set to 262144
or 256k.  I changed them (according to the documentation) to 65536 or 64k.
I noticed that the 256k buffer was also on the media server as well.  Do the
buffer sizes need to be identical for both master, media, and client?  What
about changes to the NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS and NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS_RESTORE?

Thanks, 

Thomas Gravizi 
Systems Administrator 
STERIS Corporation - Mentor, OH 
thomas_gravizi AT steris DOT com 
440.392.7630 - Tel 
440.350.7078 - Fax 



------_=_NextPart_001_01C27AB0.2E897BB0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>Improving Restore Times?</TITLE>

<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4919.2200" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=923091816-23102002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Increasing the buffer settings to 256K for our LTO drives resulted in a 
nearly doubling o<FONT face=Tahoma color=#000000>f backup speed so, yes, it can 
have&nbsp;a measurable effect.&nbsp; Matching SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS to 
NET_BUFFER_SZ 
was also beneficial.&nbsp; </FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=923091816-23102002><FONT face=Tahoma 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=923091816-23102002><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>Also set the 
NET_BUFFER_SZ to match on the clients.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=923091816-23102002><FONT face=Tahoma 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=923091816-23102002><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>I haven't played 
with NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS_RESTORE.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=923091816-23102002><FONT face=Tahoma 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=923091816-23102002><FONT face=Tahoma 
size=2>-Mark</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=923091816-23102002></SPAN><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN 
class=923091816-23102002><FONT face=Arial 
color=#0000ff>&nbsp;</FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN 
class=923091816-23102002>&nbsp;</SPAN>-----Original 
Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> 
Gravizi, Thomas [mailto:thomas_gravizi AT steris DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> 
Wednesday, 
October 23, 2002 10:01 AM<BR><B>To:</B> 
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Veritas-bu] 
Improving 
Restore Times?<BR><BR></DIV></FONT></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE><!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
  <P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Greetings,</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT face=Arial size=2>We have issues performing restores of many small 
  files.&nbsp; We are performing cold backups for our Oracle 11i instances 
which 
  are about 95 Gig and include about 575k files.&nbsp; The backup times is 
about 
  3.5-4 hours, which really isn't an issue.&nbsp; But, when we try doing a 
  restore, it take between 9-11 hours.&nbsp; I do have the Veritas NetBackup 
  Performance Tuning white papers v. 1.51, and have a few questions about 
  that.&nbsp; First of all, our indexing level is already set to 9, so that 
  setting is confirmed.&nbsp; My next settings would be the buffer 
  settings.&nbsp; Has any tried changing these and seen results?&nbsp; I looked 
  at the SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS and for some reason they were set to 262144 or 
  256k.&nbsp; I changed them (according to the documentation) to 65536 or 
  64k.&nbsp; I noticed that the 256k buffer was also on the media server as 
  well.&nbsp; Do the buffer sizes need to be identical for both master, media, 
  and client?&nbsp; What about changes to the NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS and 
  NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS_RESTORE?</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks,</FONT> </P>
  <P><B><FONT face=Verdana>Thomas Gravizi</FONT></B> <BR><FONT face=Arial 
  size=2>Systems Administrator</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>STERIS 
  Corporation - Mentor, OH</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial 
  size=2>thomas_gravizi AT steris DOT com</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial 
  size=2>440.392.7630 - Tel</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>440.350.7078 - 
  Fax</FONT> </P><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C27AB0.2E897BB0--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>