Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] backup taking too long

2002-09-18 17:43:50
Subject: [Veritas-bu] backup taking too long
From: guys AT firstlogic DOT com (Guy Speier)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 16:43:50 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C25F5C.79ED4CE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

confirm that you NIC is running at Full duplex.  Try an ftp to/from the
netbackup server of a LARGE (> 100MB) file.  Perform both a put AND a get
from both the nb master as well as the nb client.  Confirm that you are
getting proper throughput on each of the 4 transfers.  If you are not, get
with your network admin on the network side, and use the ndd commands on the
UNIX side to run at full duplex.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lowell Fafard [mailto:lfafard AT saskpower DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:33 PM
To: rene_casalme AT baxter DOT com
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] backup taking too long



What type of network card? 

We have a backups slow down because of the
/usr/openv/netbackup/NET_BUFFER_SZ parameter.  For instance we run our
backups over our IBM SP Switch and if we don't set the NET_BUFFER_SZ our
backups run very, very slow. 

Not sure if SUN is the same, but it may be something to consider. 

Lowell 




        rene_casalme AT baxter DOT com 
Sent by: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 


2002-09-18 02:52 PM 


        
        To:        veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
        cc:         
        Subject:        [Veritas-bu] backup taking too long




Hello, 

I installed another NIC card on my Sun V880 so it could be on the same
subnet as the backup server.  This took the load off the production subnet.
I created a new client on the NetBackup server for the new interface.
Unfortunately, the backup of a 35GB file system is now taking longer - in
fact, it was over 3 days until I had to finally kill the job because it
doesn't appear to be doing anything.  This process use to take about 15
hours before the addition of the extra NIC card.  There is no routing issue.
There appears to be some traffic between the server and client - used snoop.
I'm not using any bandwidth limiting parameter. 

Can anybody give any pointers or hints?  I tried searching the archives but
was unable to get anything meaningful. 

Thanks. 

Rene 




------_=_NextPart_001_01C25F5C.79ED4CE0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">


<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=445254221-18092002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>confirm that you NIC is running at Full duplex.&nbsp; Try an ftp to/from 
the netbackup server of a LARGE (&gt; 100MB) file.&nbsp; Perform both a put AND 
a get from both the nb master as well as the nb client.&nbsp; Confirm that you 
are getting proper throughput on each of the 4 transfers.&nbsp; If you are not, 
get with your network admin on the network side, and use the ndd commands on 
the 
UNIX side to run at full duplex.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Lowell Fafard 
  [mailto:lfafard AT saskpower DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, September 
18, 2002 
  4:33 PM<BR><B>To:</B> rene_casalme AT baxter DOT com<BR><B>Cc:</B> 
  veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Veritas-bu] 
backup 
  taking too long<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>What 
type 
  of network card?</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>We have a 
backups 
  slow down because of the /usr/openv/netbackup/NET_BUFFER_SZ parameter. 
  &nbsp;For instance we run our backups over our IBM SP Switch and if we don't 
  set the NET_BUFFER_SZ our backups run very, very slow.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT 
  face=sans-serif size=2>Not sure if SUN is the same, but it may be something 
to 
  consider.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Lowell</FONT> 
  <BR><BR><BR><BR>
  <TABLE width="100%">
    <TBODY>
    <TR vAlign=top>
      <TD>
      <TD><FONT face=sans-serif size=1><B>rene_casalme AT baxter DOT 
com</B></FONT> 
        <BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>Sent by: 
        veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT> 
        <P><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>2002-09-18 02:52 PM</FONT> <BR></P>
      <TD><FONT face=Arial size=1>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT 
        face=sans-serif size=1>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To: &nbsp; &nbsp; 
        &nbsp; &nbsp;veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT> <BR><FONT 
        face=sans-serif size=1>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; cc: &nbsp; &nbsp; 
        &nbsp; &nbsp;</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>&nbsp; &nbsp; 
        &nbsp; &nbsp; Subject: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[Veritas-bu] backup 
        taking too long</FONT></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><BR><BR><FONT 
face=sans-serif 
  size=2><BR>Hello,</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> <BR></FONT><FONT 
  face=sans-serif size=2><BR>I installed another NIC card on my Sun V880 so it 
  could be on the same subnet as the backup server. &nbsp;This took the load 
off 
  the production subnet. &nbsp;I created a new client on the NetBackup server 
  for the new interface. &nbsp;Unfortunately, the backup of a 35GB file system 
  is now taking longer - in fact, it was over 3 days until I had to finally 
kill 
  the job because it doesn't appear to be doing anything. &nbsp;This process 
use 
  to take about 15 hours before the addition of the extra NIC card. &nbsp;There 
  is no routing issue. &nbsp;There appears to be some traffic between the 
server 
  and client - used snoop. &nbsp;I'm not using any bandwidth limiting 
  parameter.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> <BR></FONT><FONT 
  face=sans-serif size=2><BR>Can anybody give any pointers or hints? &nbsp;I 
  tried searching the archives but was unable to get anything 
  meaningful.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> <BR></FONT><FONT 
  face=sans-serif size=2><BR>Thanks.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> 
  <BR></FONT><FONT face=sans-serif size=2><BR>Rene</FONT><FONT 
  face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C25F5C.79ED4CE0--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>