[Veritas-bu] tape drive performance on image copies
2002-08-28 11:55:35
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] tape drive performance on image copies |
From: |
jlkennedy AT amcc DOT com (Jeff Kennedy) |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:55:35 -0700 |
I just changed my settings to 262144 for both of these. Previously they
were set to 65536. We'll see how that works once I can restart the
daemons.
~JK
> "Donaldson, Mark" wrote:
>
> Check your buffer settings - this made a difference for me. See this
> tech note:
> http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/183702.htm.
>
> Having my NET_BUFFER_SZ set the same as my SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS made a
> measurable difference in my duplication speed.
>
> Also, consider the source images. If they're muliplexed then the
> desired image must be sorted from the undesired blocks resulting in
> slower copies.
>
> HTH - Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Forgette [mailto:epforgette AT overnite DOT com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:15 AM
> To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] tape drive performance on image copies
>
> I wrote a perl script to duplicate the most recent, successful, full
> backup images for a particular class. The script is available at
> http://perlvault.sourceforge.net/ (beta release still...)
>
> The problem I am having is in the performance of the image copies. My
>
> expectation was that the tape to tape copies would be faster than the
> backups themselves. The regular backup performance is limited by the
> fact that there are tons of small files and by the network speed / cpu
>
> speed of the client. My understanding is that the images (once on
> tape)
> are one sequential file, which should lend itself well to copying.
>
> The master is an E4500 running Solaris 5.8. I am using LTO drives
> which
> are SAN attached. I've seen throughput (using iostat) of 11 MB/second
>
> during regular backups. During the image copies, I get between 5 - 7
> MB/second. The regular backups do not use any multiplexing.
>
> Is there any tuning parameters I can tweak?
> Anyone have any ideas?
>
> Regards,
> -Eric
> --
> Eric Forgette
> Unix Systems Administrator
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
--
=====================
Jeff Kennedy
Unix Administrator
AMCC
jlkennedy AT amcc DOT com
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] tape drive performance on image copies, Eric Forgette
- [Veritas-bu] tape drive performance on image copies, Donaldson, Mark
- [Veritas-bu] tape drive performance on image copies,
Jeff Kennedy <=
- [Veritas-bu] tape drive performance on image copies, Ballowe, Charles
- [Veritas-bu] tape drive performance on image copies, Donaldson, Mark
- [Veritas-bu] tape drive performance on image copies, Ballowe, Charles
- [Veritas-bu] tape drive performance on image copies, Donaldson, Mark
|
|
|