[Veritas-bu] Activity Monitor Differences Between NBU 3.2 and 3.4
2002-07-05 11:05:27
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] Activity Monitor Differences Between NBU 3.2 and 3.4 |
From: |
dfdwyer AT tecoenergy DOT com (Dennis Dwyer) |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jul 2002 11:05:27 -0400 |
After having been gone from my office for the last 8 months I returned to find
NBU 3.2 has been upgraded to NBU 3.4 by my backup cohorts in crime. This is a
good thing, however, in 3.2 I wrote a small script to extract data from the
activity monitor data so I could keep running statistics on job elapsed time.
It appears, under 3.4, that the numbers don't match up anymore. Has anyone else
noticed this? Here's my example:
In the 3.4 Job Details screen for a particular job the following information is
present:
Started: 07/02/2002 00:40:08
Elapsed: 00:01:05
Ended: 07/02/2002
This information is correct and what I need for my report.
What I see in the 3.4 Activity Monitor line for the same job is as follows:
Started: 07/01/2002 23:05:43
Elapsed: 01:35:30
Ended: 07/02/2002 00:41:13
Definitely not the same. It appears that the Activity Monitor includes within
its Elapsed Time the time that the job was submitted and sat waiting in the
queue. It seems to me that the queue time should be stored in a separate filed
and the elapsed time should reflect the true time that the job actually ran
under process.
Is this something that will be fixed or clarified in a future release? Perhaps
4.5, which I will be migrating to sometime late this year or early next year?
This change sure has thrown my reporting off kilter.
Regards,
Dennis
Quote: "Time is not a test of the truth"
Translation: Just because you've always done it that way, doesn't make it right
Dennis F. Dwyer
Enterprise Storage Manager
Tampa Electric Company
(813) 225-5181 - Voice
(813) 275-3599 - FAX
Visit our corporate website at www.tecoenergy.com
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] Activity Monitor Differences Between NBU 3.2 and 3.4,
Dennis Dwyer <=
|
|
|