Veritas-bu

FW: [Veritas-bu] OTM and PST files.

2002-06-06 07:48:47
Subject: FW: [Veritas-bu] OTM and PST files.
From: boazb AT ti DOT com (Barda, Boaz)
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:48:47 +0300
Even when the Backup server is a UNIX type ?
How do they integrate?! I have these prodcut from the days we backed up with
Backup exec. 

-----Original Message-----
From: paulg AT CDCNA DOT COM [mailto:paulg AT CDCNA DOT COM]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Barda, Boaz; 'paulg AT CDCNA DOT COM'
Cc: 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] OTM and PST files.


No, it works with NBU as well as most of the other backup software.

paulg

On Jun 6,  2:43pm, Barda, Boaz wrote:
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] OTM and PST files.
>
> St.Bernard OFM can not b used with Netbacup its for backup exec no?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: paulg AT CDCNA DOT COM [mailto:paulg AT CDCNA DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:29 PM
> To: Barda, Boaz
> Cc: 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] OTM and PST files.
>
>
> Unfortunately, on systems that are very acrive or have a lot of locally
> attached storage that is being used OTM may not work.  Even with
finetuning
> our
> NT file server was not able to utilize OTM.  We now use St.Bernard OFM, no
> issues so far.
>
> paulg
>
> On Jun 6, 11:30am, Barda, Boaz wrote:
> > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] OTM and PST files.
> > Ok... I followed all Veritas tech notes on how to fine tune the OTM . I
> > still have some, but not all, PST files that cant be backed up. about 5%
> > .....
> > Did anyone hae that problem where some get backed up and some not?!
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anderson, David [mailto:anderson.david AT scrippshealth DOT org]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:21 AM
> > To: 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] OTM and PST files.
> >
> >
> > First let me say that I'm not the expert on OTM.  We are a new
> installation
> > and are actually using ver 4.5 at this time (tried 3.4.1, with problems
in
> > SSO).  From calls and complaints to Tech Support, sluggish though they
> are,
> > the consensus that I'm getting is that there is a difference in "open
> > files".
> >
> > Open files that are Locked (but not exclusively) are backup-able (is
that
> a
> > word??).  However there must be a static (quiescent) time that must be
met
> > (it is set in the registry on 3.4).  If it isn't static for at least
that
> > time setting, it's a no-go.
> >
> > However, files that are locked exclusively (such as a database,
Exchange,
> MS
> > SQL, Oracle), it is never possible, no matter what the "quiescent" time.
> If
> > you really want all those files, the database or other offending service
> > needs to be shutdown (that is, the files get unlocked the hard way).
> >
> > PST files fall under "locked, but not exclusively" category.
> >
> > David Anderson
> > ScrippsHealth Information Services
> >
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ----  Original Message snippet
> > -
> > >>Shouldn't OTM solve the problem of backing up opened PST files ?
> >
> > >>It is not an exchange server we are backing up here but the user's
local
> > pst
> > >>files. DO I need another module?!
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> > _______________________________________________
> > Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> >-- End of excerpt from Barda, Boaz
>
>-- End of excerpt from Barda, Boaz


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>