Hey!
Figured that you ment 196.. try raising the limit of jobs per client but
remmeber that if you use too much jobs , client might get stuck,
Happend to me (...)
Shahar.
Robert Johannes
<ROBERT_JOHANNES AT udlp DOT com> To: nb
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Sent by: cc:
veritas-bu-admin AT mailman DOT eng Subject:
[Veritas-bu] Re: Concurrent class backup limit
.auburn.edu
30/04/2002 18:07
Aah,
shacks; I notice I said the error I get is 96, but I meant 196 (client
backup was not attempted because backup window closed). Sorry for the
typo.
robert
Robert Johannes wrote:
>
> Folks,
> I was watching my backups and noticed this scenario: I had 3 drives
> availabe, and I had four classes from the same client doing a Full
> backup to one drive (This was getting me about 51 gigs an hour on
> SDLT). I then noticed two incremental classes from the same client were
> queued, but remained queued for the duration of their window, and
> finally failed with a status 96. Why didn't the two incrementals use
> any of the available 3 drives (and plenty of scratch tapes); is there a
> limit (to a max of four) to how many classes from the same client can be
> active, and so, where do I change that?
>
> thanks
> robert
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|