Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Drive Type dlt vs dlt2

2002-03-27 11:31:37
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Drive Type dlt vs dlt2
From: ccang AT ncs.com DOT sg (Ang Chip Chiang NCS)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 00:31:37 +0800
Actually if you are using the Device Configuration Wizard to configure your
drives, you will notice that NetBackup will automatically assign the media
type for a DLT8000 to dlt2 and SDLT to dlt3.
This is due to the drives mapping file located in /usr/openv/volmgr/database


-----Original Message-----
From: William Enestvedt
To: 'kk downing'
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Sent: 3/27/02 9:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Drive Type dlt vs dlt2

kk downing wrote:
>
> I am confused how are they different media types 
> if they are both DLT format tapes?
>
   You're not confused at all: they _are_ the same kind of physical
media.
   The choice is offered so that if you want to keep some of your tapes
separate from others, you can define them as dlt instead of dlt2. (This
distinction is like Volume Groups: no real difference, just an
organizational technique.)
   For example, say you have a robot with four DLT8000 drives and forty
tape
slots. You can define one drive as dlt2 and the other three drives as
dlt.
Perhaps you decide to add ten tapes will as dlt2 and the other thirty as
dlt; when a job is sent to the dlt2 drive, it won't use any of the
thirty
dlt tapes. You could take advantage of this to keep backups of the same
renention period but different uses from mingling on the same tape:
handy
for off-siting, for instance.
    Really, it's not a big deal (unless you want to do this and
couldn't!).
Just use dlt and pretend that dlt2 ad dlt3 don't exist. :7)
-wde
P.S. If I'm wrong, could someone please correct me?
--
Will Enestvedt
UNIX System Administrator
Johnson & Wales University -- Providence, RI
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>