Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Top 10 Things I Hate About NetBackup

2002-01-24 09:02:20
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Top 10 Things I Hate About NetBackup
From: prasadchalikonda AT yahoo DOT com (Prasad Chalikonda)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:02:20 -0500
You go Bob!!!!! I second that.


Prasad.


Metcalf, Bob wrote:

>Here's my gripe....
>
>How about a pathc-level Matrix on the bloody
>web site?  How hard is this:
>
>Solaris7 server,  NBpatchXXX, NBpatchYYY
>NT4SP6 server,  NBpatchHHH, NBpatchTTT
>
>Is there anybody out there that can claim
>to actually make sense of the current page?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Miriam Ben-Haim [mailto:miriam AT techunix.technion.ac DOT il]
>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:55 AM
>To: Fabbro, Andrew P
>Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Top 10 Things I Hate About NetBackup
>
>
>
>
>I would add:
>
> full backup should not expire as long as other backups depending on
> it are not expired, even if its original expiration date arrived.
>
>and
>
> update and install clients' software with ssh rather than rsh.
>
>
>
>       Miriam
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Miriam Ben-Haim                 E-mail: miriam AT technion.ac DOT il
> Unix Systems                    Phone : +972-4-8292177
> Taub Computer Center            Fax   : +972-4-8236212
> Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, ISRAEL
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Fabbro, Andrew P wrote:
>
>>Entertaining myself here at lunch, I present, in no particular order...
>>
>>10. Can't set exclude lists at the master, only at the client.  Very silly.
>>I would like to exclude, say, /tmp or WIN386.SWP on all clients in a class
>>but I can't...instead, I have to make sure the exclude file is correct on
>>each client.  What a nightmare for large environments.  Some admin adds a
>>client (that I may not have access to check his setup) and doesn't set his
>>exclude list properly.  Now I'm chewing tapes for nothing, or worse, not
>>backing up something he needs.  What was the thinking here?  Particularly
>>since the raw Class database shows an Exclude field ;)
>>
>>9. "Use any available media server" doesn't round-robin.  Strange but true
>>
>-
>
>>it works the list of media servers *alphabetically*.  If you have multiple
>>media servers, then NetBackup will attempt to use all of the drives on #1,
>>then go on to #2, etc.  If one of the drives in #1 becomes free, then it'll
>>use it before going back to #2.  So if you have multiple media servers and
>>want to distribute the load, it's difficult to do so because your full
>>
>tapes
>
>>will naturally accumulate in the first (alphabetically speaking) storage
>>unit.
>>
>>8. Can't restart just one stream.  If a single stream fails, you have to
>>rerun the whole backup job.  Blech.  Why can't I restart just that one
>>stream?
>>
>>7. The X-windows backup/restore GUI doesn't have a "preview media required"
>>feature for a restore.  The Java backup/restore GUI doesn't show you a list
>>of the backup images.  I wish there was one that did both ;)
>>
>>6. bpinject sucks.  I think bpinject is only packaged with bpvault.  The
>>design is really amazingly bad.  The idea is that you can type "bpinject 2"
>>and it'll dump the cap from robot 2 into the robot.  However, if that robot
>>is on another machine, then you need to have root-level .rhosts access to
>>it.  Oh sure, let me rewrite our site security policy so I can insert tapes
>>- har!  This is a particularly bad design because you can use Netbackup's
>>vmchange to insert the tapes through NetBackup.  The only reason you need
>>.rhost access is to query the robot - I'm opening my whole system up just
>>
>so
>
>>you can query the robot!?!?
>>
>>A better solution is simple:
>>
>>      - write a service on the media server that runs out of inetd that
>>reports the status of the robot.  Takes
>>      about 100 lines of perl.
>>      - when the bpinject script needs to know what the status of the
>>robot is, it can connect to this service
>>      and query the status of the robot, then use vmchange (vmadd, etc.)
>>to insert tapes.
>>
>>5. jnbSA sends the root password in the clear.  Come on people, this is
>>
>2002
>
>>- how hard would it be to encrypt this?
>>
>>4. Frequency for hours, days, and weeks...but not months!  How can I do
>>
>once
>
>>a month?  I can do every 4 weeks, but that doesn't really work because
>>there's an extra week every quarter.
>>
>>3. Stupid bug - put in a path like "/somewhere/someplace/blah   ".  Note
>>
>the
>
>>blanks.  Now run a coverage report.  Note that this is reported as
>>"UNCOVERED".  Sheesh.  Also, if you put "C:" in a file list, you'll get
>>
>only
>
>>the "Veritas" folder on C:.  If you put "C:\", though, you get everything.
>>
>>2.  Archive doesn't make two copies, only one.  Considering that you're
>>blowing the data away from disk, I'd feel better if it was written to two
>>tapes, but NetBackup only does one.  I wish this was configurable.
>>
>>1. It's still better than any other product on the market.
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>_______________________________________________
>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>