Hello.

fyi:

The patch for Solaris 2.6 for SUN GigE interface is 106764-07.
Nuff said....

Tim


>From: "Tim Allen" <tallen201 AT hotmail DOT com>
>To: benr AT cuddletech DOT com, Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SOLUTION: Oracle RMAN on NB 3.2 vs 3.4
>Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:15:11 -0400
>
>Hello.
>
>I was wondering if you have had any problems since your change?
>
>I was seeing a similar problem, and even thought it was cause since the one
>class I'd tested with did have max jobs/client set to default 1.  I set it
>to 99 and I still have the same problem with db restores.  Four tapes will
>be placed in the drives and only one sometimes two will be read the other
>two are never read and the restore eventually dies to no throughput.
>
>"We ran several tests with a smaller database using various
>combinations and everything worked fine.  Combinations included:
>
>8.0.6 RMAN catalog backing up an 8.0.6 database
>8.1.7 RMAN catalog backing up an 8.0.6 database
>8.1.7 RMAN catalog backing up an 8.1.7 database
>
>The database that was successful is small and all datafiles were cooked
>file system.  The database that is failing is 450gb and datafiles are
>all raw partitions.  The latest failure was an 8.1.7 RMAN catalog
>backing up an 8.0.6 database.  We've never had a successful restore of
>this database with any of the above combinations.
>
>Two raw partitions were created on our test database
>(15gb in size for each).  I loaded about 500m of data on each tablespace
>within the raw partition and successfully backed up the database.
>
>The restore, however, hung (behavior we're seeing on the 450gb database
>with raw partitions). The rman catalog is 8.0.6 and the database is also
>8.0.6.  "
>
>Thanks for any help.
>Tim
>
>>From: benr AT cuddletech DOT com
>>To: <Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
>>Subject: [Veritas-bu] SOLUTION: Oracle RMAN on NB 3.2 vs 3.4
>>Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
>>
>>Well thanx to Guy Speier I've solved the problem.  Apparently the default
>>number of jobs per client was lowered in NetBackup 3.4.  Even though the
>>system was configured properly the whole time, because jobs per client was
>>set to 1 I couldn't get the needed result of one channel per tape.  I
>>changed the setting to 4 (for kicks) and did a test backup and BOOM!  
>>Done!
>>
>>Thanx to all who replied.
>>
>>benr AT cuddletech DOT com
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>_______________________________________________
>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp