Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Fragment size settings

2001-10-17 10:23:29
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Fragment size settings
From: BrochF AT europe.stortek DOT com (Brochart, Fabrice)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:23:29 +0100
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C15717.4ADE46F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

        Hi ,=20

I read somewhere that restore is more faster with fragment size (depend =
on
size (depend on backup :) ))

And some customers tells me the same things but I've never verified.

HTH

F@brice

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Sixbury, Dan [mailto:sixbury AT celeritas DOT com]
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 17 octobre 2001 16:00
=C0 : EBU (E-mail)
Objet : [Veritas-bu] Fragment size settings


Has anyone seen any benefits for using fragment size on the storage =
units,
or have reasons to not use fragment sizes?  I think the default is
unlimited, but I noticed that we had some storage units that were set =
to
2000 while others had the default of unlimited.=20

Thanks,
Dan
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

------_=_NextPart_001_01C15717.4ADE46F0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: [Veritas-bu] Fragment size settings</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <FONT SIZE=3D2>Hi , =
</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I read somewhere that restore is more faster with =
fragment size (depend on size (depend on backup :) ))</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>And some customers tells me the same things but I've =
never verified.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>HTH</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>F@brice</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Message d'origine-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>De : Sixbury, Dan [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:sixbury AT celeritas DOT com">mailto:sixbury AT celeritas DOT 
com</A>]<=
/FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Envoy=E9 : mercredi 17 octobre 2001 16:00</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>=C0 : EBU (E-mail)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Objet : [Veritas-bu] Fragment size settings</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Has anyone seen any benefits for using fragment size =
on the storage units,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>or have reasons to not use fragment sizes?&nbsp; I =
think the default is</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>unlimited, but I noticed that we had some storage =
units that were set to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>2000 while others had the default of unlimited. =
</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Thanks,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Dan</FONT>
<BR><FONT =
SIZE=3D2>_______________________________________________</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Veritas-bu maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; =
Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2><A =
HREF=3D"http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu"; =
TARGET=3D"_blank">http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas=
-bu</A></FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C15717.4ADE46F0--