Re: [Networker] Why doesn't nsrinfo show me saveset details?

2012-10-11 12:35:23
Subject: Re: [Networker] Why doesn't nsrinfo show me saveset details?
From: George Sinclair <george.sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:34:51 -0400
On 2012-10-11 07:37, Michael Leone wrote:
One thing that may be a good question to ask... Are the save sets
Nope, we don't use NDMP.
Have you looked at the actual index structure itself before and after
scanning? Does it appear to be a full and complete directory? In other
words, does it have a lot of files and/or subdirectories with the naming
conventions that one would expect to see in an index? What happens if
you run a subsequent check against the index, e.g. level 5 or 6?
Is it possible that the browse policy on the affected clients may need
to be increased? I remember a number of years ago, I had to merge in an
older index with the current information, and NW kept dropping the older
information. It was not until I reset the clock on the server to an
older date that it finally worked. This was a different situation than
yours because I only needed the index for a temporary recovery, and then
I was able to reset the clock and go back to where I was prior. It was
weird deal, but in that case, if the shoe fits ... I think there were
some quirks with NW's ability to merge in older indexes, but that was
then, this is now. Just mentioning it because I remember a number of
complaints about this problem in older releases, and a number of
proposed workarounds with the usual "Gee, I've never seen that before"
responses as well.
Is it possible that there's a difference in time zones (e.g. EDT versus
UTC) or some such thing?
It would seem that if nsrinfo isn't reporting anything then unless
you're running the command with the incorrect options or values (this
happens to me sometimes where I accidentally use the ssid rather than
the nsavetime value or some such thing) then there simply isn't anything
in the index for that nsavetime value. It didn't get picked up by your
scanner command, and/or it was dropped during the process. As a test,
could you try creating a list of an index directory, scan in one small
save set using the same steps you carried out prior, generate a new list
and compare. Next, try repeating the test using the full steps others
have recommended? Do you still have any of the older tapes around to run
such a test?

George Sinclair
Voice: (301) 713-3284 x210
- The preceding message is personal and does not reflect any official or 
unofficial position of the United States Department of Commerce -
- Any opinions expressed in this message are NOT those of the US Govt. -