Networker

Re: [Networker] Pools ?

2012-02-14 18:05:56
Subject: Re: [Networker] Pools ?
From: Preston de Guise <enterprise.backup AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:05:26 +1100
On 15/02/2012, at 10:02 AM, bingo wrote:

> At least you should have 2 pools:
>  - one for the data
>  - one for index and bootstraps (to recover them faster, if necessary)

I have to say I *always* advise against separating indices and bootstraps off 
to dedicated pools.

It makes for a bunch of configuration hassles, and it also increases media 
contention when there is no logical reason to have separation. You don't really 
recover indices any faster by having them on their own devices; they're still 
going to be multiplexed to the same degree as backups to any other device, and 
by having them written to dedicated pools, you increase drive contention.

Cheers,
Preston.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>