Networker

Re: [Networker] replacing NSR peer information on a NetWorker server

2012-02-02 03:28:12
Subject: Re: [Networker] replacing NSR peer information on a NetWorker server
From: Otto Gudjonsson <ovg AT EXELLO DOT NO>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:17:40 +0000
Hi tim
You need to contact EMC for a rehosting on your Networker server.


Med vennlig hilsen / Best Regards, 

Otto V. Gudjonsson
Senior Technical Account Manager
Exello Norge AS - Kronprinsensgate 1 - N.0251 Oslo - NORWAY



+47 24 13 08 00 - http://www.exello.com 

Følg oss på Twitter: http://twitter.com/ExelloNorge

(Kopier alltid support AT exello DOT no på tekniske henvendelser)


-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On 
Behalf Of Tim Mooney
Sent: 1. februar 2012 20:13
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] replacing NSR peer information on a NetWorker server

All-

Yesterday I replaced the hardware on our primary NetWorker server.  The server 
OS also went from RHEL 5.7 to RHEL 6.2.  The NetWorker version stayed the same 
(7.6.2.5), but I did convert from 32 bit to 64 bit NetWorker install.

As described in the installation guide, that meant going through the disaster 
recovery procedure.  I'm well-versed in that procedure and it went fine, as did 
reconfiguring the jukebox (the control port changed SCSI address) and 
recovering the client file indexes.

Much to my surprise, though, the disaster recover procedure does *not* bring 
back the previous "nsrladb" when it recovers the other resources.
This means that the server certificate used as part of the "peer"
authentication changed.

Surprisingly, only about two dozen of our 125+ clients failed their backups 
last night because of the change in the server certificate, but now I'm in a 
quandary.

I've now been through one (incremental) cycle with the new/regenerated server 
cert.  Can I simply replace the new certificate (or entire nsrladb) with the 
one recovered from backups, or is that just going to cause problems for other 
clients?

If I controlled all of the clients that failed, I would just delete their 
server peer information and let it be regenerated, but unfortunately many of 
the clients are SLA backup customers, so I have no access to the client systems.

Any thoughts on whether replacing the nsrladb on a NetWorker server with a 
recovered copy is a good idea, or if that's just asking for trouble?

Thanks,

Tim
-- 
Tim Mooney                                             Tim.Mooney AT ndsu DOT 
edu
Enterprise Computing & Infrastructure                  701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building                             701-231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER